Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
—I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
These countries don’t agree on cricket rules, historical maps, or the correct way to eat curry.
But on Trump?
Consensus achieved.
These countries don’t agree on cricket rules, historical maps, or the correct way to eat curry.
But on Trump?
Consensus achieved.
Trump softens China language
Trump avoids endorsing Japan’s Taiwan stance
Trump boasts about “decoupling success”
Decoupling without deterrence
is like moving your furniture out of a burning house
while refusing to call the fire department
Trump softens China language
Trump avoids endorsing Japan’s Taiwan stance
Trump boasts about “decoupling success”
Decoupling without deterrence
is like moving your furniture out of a burning house
while refusing to call the fire department
Unable or unwilling to confront the true threat,
the administration redirects its assertiveness toward smaller, dependent partners.
baby this is
Igeopolitics as therapy.
@wsj.com
www.wsj.com/world/china/...
Unable or unwilling to confront the true threat,
the administration redirects its assertiveness toward smaller, dependent partners.
baby this is
Igeopolitics as therapy.
You have a PR document designed to avoid upsetting Beijing.
@wsj.com
www.wsj.com/world/china/...
You have a PR document designed to avoid upsetting Beijing.
This is what opportunistic coercion looks like.
abcnews.go.com/Internationa...
the US won’t forcefully back Japan on Taiwan…
why would China expect pushback when harassing the Philippines?
This is what opportunistic coercion looks like.
abcnews.go.com/Internationa...
the US won’t forcefully back Japan on Taiwan…
why would China expect pushback when harassing the Philippines?
It’s projection from someone who has never understood sacrifice — political, military, or moral.
Ukrainians are fighting for survival.
He is fighting for clicks.
It’s projection from someone who has never understood sacrifice — political, military, or moral.
Ukrainians are fighting for survival.
He is fighting for clicks.
“Radar lock-ons? Twice?
Beijing’s way of asking:
“Is anyone in Washington awake, or is silence now official policy?
“Radar lock-ons? Twice?
Beijing’s way of asking:
“Is anyone in Washington awake, or is silence now official policy?
it’s strategic exposure.
If you can’t endorse your closest ally’s reading of the single most dangerous flashpoint in Asia, how can you claim to have an Indo-Pacific strategy at all?
then what exactly remains of its Indo-Pacific strategy?
“No one is safe.”
That is exactly why Beijing tries — not because it works, but because the attempt spreads fear.
it’s strategic exposure.
If you can’t endorse your closest ally’s reading of the single most dangerous flashpoint in Asia, how can you claim to have an Indo-Pacific strategy at all?
then what exactly remains of its Indo-Pacific strategy?
China: furious
Washington: quietly pursuing the Nobel Prize for Strategic Self-Silencing
Colby’s camp:a soundscape study titled ‘Silence: An Indo-Pacific Tragedy’
China: furious
Washington: quietly pursuing the Nobel Prize for Strategic Self-Silencing
Colby’s camp:a soundscape study titled ‘Silence: An Indo-Pacific Tragedy’
When Japan steps out on the tightrope, the U.S. is supposed to hold the safety net.
The FT excerpts show the U.S. folding the net up and wandering off to lunch.
LOL
When Japan steps out on the tightrope, the U.S. is supposed to hold the safety net.
The FT excerpts show the U.S. folding the net up and wandering off to lunch.
LOL
blackhat.com/eu-25/briefi...
blackhat.com/eu-25/briefi...
Japan frustrated at Trump administration’s world-class attempt at winning the Nobel Prize for Strategic Self-Silencing.
Subhead:
U.S. officials maintain strict discipline in saying absolutely nothing of value.
Japan frustrated at Trump administration’s world-class attempt at winning the Nobel Prize for Strategic Self-Silencing.
Subhead:
U.S. officials maintain strict discipline in saying absolutely nothing of value.
They are ideological populists with an authoritarian edge,
For us,
It is strategically dangerous.
They are ideological populists with an authoritarian edge,
For us,
It is strategically dangerous.
The document basically says:
Allies are useless.
Europe is suspicious
Japan And Taiwan can figure it out themselves.
Russia is misunderstood.
China is an inconvenience, not a threat.
The document basically says:
Allies are useless.
Europe is suspicious
Japan And Taiwan can figure it out themselves.
Russia is misunderstood.
China is an inconvenience, not a threat.
1. It signals that U.S. commitments are conditional, improvisational, and subject to internal political moods rather than strategy.
1. It signals that U.S. commitments are conditional, improvisational, and subject to internal political moods rather than strategy.
In Silicon Valley, heroes are people who:
broke rules
ignored procedures
gambled big
disrupted whole sectors
Social legitimacy comes from harmony, not rebellion
In Japan, someone who loudly says:
“This entire structure should be destroyed!”
…is not seen as visionary.
They are seen as 危険人物 (a dangerous person) or simply unserious.
In Silicon Valley, heroes are people who:
broke rules
ignored procedures
gambled big
disrupted whole sectors
Musk And Mike —Possessing a disruptor mindset
Musk And Mike —Possessing a disruptor mindset
This linguistic downgrade dilutes deterrence and signals hesitation—exactly what Beijing wants.
It is another example of the Trump administration’s broader pattern: reduce commitments, soften red lines, shift burdens, and call it “peace.”
This linguistic downgrade dilutes deterrence and signals hesitation—exactly what Beijing wants.
It is another example of the Trump administration’s broader pattern: reduce commitments, soften red lines, shift burdens, and call it “peace.”
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12...
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12...
Why? Because the target audience cannot easily distinguish platform governance in a foreign jurisdiction from sovereign control over U.S. citizens.
1. Turn a regulatory fine into an existential civilizational conflict.
2. Delegitimize EU institutions and push for disintegration (“Abolish the EU”).
3. Frame tech companies as victims and sovereign regulators as tyrants.
1. Turn a regulatory fine into an existential civilizational conflict.
2. Delegitimize EU institutions and push for disintegration (“Abolish the EU”).
3. Frame tech companies as victims and sovereign regulators as tyrants.