Westonhaus
banner
westonhaus.bsky.social
Westonhaus
@westonhaus.bsky.social
330 followers 310 following 1.1K posts
Navy Veteran, Chemist, Skeptic, Wonk, Epistemophile, Michigan native. I find truth, and try to spread it. It's not always pretty.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Anonymous = Constellis? Gotta get those sweet contracts for controlling ANTIFA...
When laws are not clearly enumerated or punishments specified, this administration will test the boundaries for its own aims every time. Walking that fine line until they push over it in a rush.

The worst people.
I like your optimism. I don't share it, but I like it.

When the shooting starts, no one really knows when it will end.
If the military were monolithic, I'd agree. MAGA is in the military. MAGA is some of the people making the rules. MAGA has a domestic army of thugs that can terrorize and harm citizens.

And "we" voted him in. After SCOTUS gave him immunity. It's not simple and it ends in blood.
True... but when was the last time (some parts of) the military went against the Constitution? The Civil War. Deposing Trump is tantamount to this, and it would be a LOT messier than North v. South this time.

The military stays out of it until there is no other recourse.
I would be bristling against everything if I were currently in (I served in the 90's). But the generals don't want to become Caesar. They don't want to upset 250 years of Democracy, as shattered as it is. And the heart of man is cowardly.
It isn't. Our military is non-partisan, and proudly so. But until given a treasonous order (even Kegsbreth and Stinky's meeting of leadership was just platitudes and no distinct orders), the military needs to stay out of it. It's a fine line they tread...
It's the ocean of shit we're all drowning in. Without removing him and his enablers... the courts and peaceful protests are the last recourse until John Brown starts coming into play.

Then it turns into an ocean of blood.
I agree with you entirely, and would love to see the NG stay home and not ramp up tensions, but they are following orders that are muddily legal up to this point. Certainly not moral or justified, but legal.

Unless violence occurs or they violate a ban order, their compliance is expected.
And... most courts are finding that. And... the JAG corps has been gutted so they can't advise NG groups.

The legality of posse comitatus is... less established law in the face of a President trying to break it than you think. It certainly isn't on the NG to determine it. It's all bad.
In which state/city has the guard deployed where a court order specifically barring them from deploying been in place? Most of these issues are still being argued in the courts, and SCOTUS hasn't weighed in per se.

I don't like it either.
I'm full up on bad news, thanks. But I meant the NG on American soil. Sorry for not disambiguating. Yeah, yeah, riot control.

But also, guard that took violent action largely were held to account. Showing up for the event, not so much.
I ain't giving that either.

But that's the thing. It's a job that people want to, y'know, do well at. Following orders that aren't obviously evil is kinda the expectation.
No one is alright.

But if you want Prince's Wiki entry:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erik_Pr....
Also, the article should be linked if you have a NYT subscription (I don't or I would share).
Erik Prince - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Racism is a large part of it, for sure. But characterizing ICE's actions like the Gestapo's is... limiting.

The ethnicity isn't key. The eventual aim is ideology. Which is where they are fucking up. And until the NG actually acts, I don't know which way it goes.
True dat. It boils down to "don't shoot innocents" (or bomb them, poison them, torture them, etc).

The NG hasn't done that since Kent State. That I know of.
Commanding? No.

Recruiting? Yes.
Both the UCMJ and Geneva Accords were taught to us in the Nav when I was in. There are rules to war and peacetime conduct. Other things are not enumerated in those documents (such as posse comitatus) that need legal sorting when POTUS decides to call something an "emergency".

Laws aren't perfect.
Yes, yes... Reardon was CEO. But if you think that Prince doesn't call a ton of shots while he has gotten more political since allying closely with Trump, you need your head checked.
Cool. But how did this turn into an ethnic cleansing conversation?

I'm ex-Navy. There were consequences to refusing orders, although I did that twice. Once where I had JAG coverage, and the other where I fucked up. Wasn't shootin' people in any event. I won't bad mouth the NG at this point though.
General, JAG officers would make final determinations for grunts deploying. Which has been gutted by Hegseth. Other than that, a soldier has the UCMJ and International Law to guide his action on the ground.

/Deployment legality would be the courts if Constitutionally questionable.
Maybe I just know good ones? But your thoughts on them are pretty grim.
I know 3 people who were NG this year.
One was forced out because he's trans.
Second is a gung-ho kid who works a farm but serves simply.
Third is older and hates the orders being given, but can't see a way to refuse non-violent, court-approved ones without retribution. No bueno.
I think they come in all types. I'm ex-Navy and know a lot of them. Some like the violence. Some shuck oysters, I suppose.

But if he worked for Constellis, he worked for Prince in 2018, which is essentially Blackwater.
That's fair. Right wing media is going to have a heyday with all the problems I've mentioned though (hypocritically, after loving on Kegbreath for so long).

I wouldn't vote for him. But there's one way to find out if I'm right... elect the man.