@wendyweiser.bsky.social
5.8K followers 150 following 65 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted
brennancenter.org
President Trump is using the Justice Department as a weapon against his political enemies. Today NY Attorney General Letitia James was indicted after the president demanded her prosecution. Yesterday James Comey pled not guilty to charges brought against him at the president's request. 1/2
Reposted
brennancenter.org
The Trump administration is pressuring states to hand over sensitive information about voters. The Brennan Center is tracking the DOJ’s requests and how states respond. bit.ly/3JFbKaB
Tracker of Justice Department Requests for Voter Information
The Trump administration is pressing state officials to provide sensitive information about voters.
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted
brennancenter.org
“[Trump’s] proposed census shake-up threatens to destabilize this process for partisan political gain. . . . We know this playbook because Trump tried and failed to exploit the census along these lines last time he was in office.” — @wendyweiser.bsky.social and @tomtmwolf.bsky.social
Don’t debase the census
Meddling in the census fits into the Trump administration’s broader efforts to manipulate data and institutions to skew elections in his party’s favor.
contrarian.substack.com
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Did the WaPo editorial board seriously suggest that Congress abolishing the filibuster (its own rule) to pass election legislation within its constitutional authority is similar to the president taking over elections without any constitutional authority? www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/202...
Opinion | Everyone loses when the federal government runs elections
Trump’s promised executive order on mail-in voting won’t have teeth.
www.washingtonpost.com
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Trump's proposed executive order on elections is flatly illegal & unconstitutional. Presidents have no lawful role in running elections. Only the states and Congress do. Courts have already rejected his prior elections EO on this basis. This claim of authority to take over elections is chilling.
marcelias.bsky.social
🚨BREAKING: Donald Trump announces he will issue an unconstitutional and illegal executive order purporting to ban mail-in voting and certain voting equipment for the 2026 midterm election.

Such an effort would violate the Constitution and is a major step to prevent free and fair elections.
Reposted
statesunited.org
MUST READ >> A new report from @brennancenter.org lays out a coordinated strategy being enacted by the Trump Administration to undermine free, fair, and secure elections using the federal government itself.

Learn more: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election
The executive branch is interfering in U.S. elections in unprecedented ways.
www.brennancenter.org
wendyweiser.bsky.social
New curtain raiser on the Trump Administration's concerted efforts to undermine elections. While attacks on elections are (sadly) not new, the effort to mobilize the power of the federal govt in service of those attacks is very new & very dangerous. www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election
The executive branch is interfering in U.S. elections in unprecedented ways.
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted
brennancenter.org
"There are voters like me who followed the rules, provided all the information election officials asked for when they registered to vote…. Please, do not remove the voices of registered North Carolina voters." - Mary Kay Heling, North Carolina voter www.brennancenter.org/our-work/ana...
North Carolinians Go to Court to Protect Their Right to Vote
In the Trump administration’s lawsuit against the state board of elections over the voter rolls, hundreds of thousands of voters are at risk of disenfranchisement.
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Today President Trump said that birthright citizenship just "had to do with the babies of slaves." That is plainly wrong.
Historian Martha Jones & the Brennan Center's Historians Council member Kate Masur explain that the history says otherwise here: www.brennancenter.org/media/14006/...
www.brennancenter.org
wendyweiser.bsky.social
My colleague ‪@sam-breidbart.bsky.social‬ has more on why this is historically inaccurate: bsky.app/profile/sam-...
sam-breidbart.bsky.social
President Trump continues to get the history of the 14th Amendment wrong. He says birthright citizenship was only granted to newly freed slaves. But the 14th Amendment was clearly broader than that – and everyone at the time knew it.
atrupar.com
Trump: "If you look at the end of the Civil War -- the 1800s, it was a very turbulent time. If you take the end day -- was it 1869? Or whatever."
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Today President Trump said that birthright citizenship just "had to do with the babies of slaves." That is plainly wrong.
Historian Martha Jones & the Brennan Center's Historians Council member Kate Masur explain that the history says otherwise here: www.brennancenter.org/media/14006/...
www.brennancenter.org
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Today President Trump said that birthright citizenship just “had to do with the babies of slaves." That is plainly wrong.
Historian Martha Jones & the Brennan Center's Historians Council member Kate Masur explain that the history says otherwise here: www.brennancenter.org/media/14006/...
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted
wendyweiser.bsky.social
The court’s ruling does, however, seriously weaken the tools available to federal courts to enforce adherence to the law. In that way, it has emboldened executive abuse of power.
wendyweiser.bsky.social
At some point, Congress will need to fix this and all the other messes this Court has created.
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Great thread. Agree this is madness. Let’s not underestimate the ability of litigants to craft effective new strategies to protect every person’s citizenship
rights.
stevenmazie.bsky.social
FIRST OPINION: TRUMP V CASA

Court grants Trump's request to narrow the injunctions against his birthright citizenship EO
Reposted
stevenmazie.bsky.social
FIRST OPINION: TRUMP V CASA

Court grants Trump's request to narrow the injunctions against his birthright citizenship EO
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Stepping back, it is very disappointing, to say the least, that the Court went out of its way to weaken the tools available to the Courts to rein in abuse of power at a time of unprecedented threat to the rule of law.
wendyweiser.bsky.social
But it also left open other avenues for litigants to get broad and even nationwide relief against unconstitutional government actions. I expect litigants will fully avail themselves of those avenues quickly to enforce citizenship rights.
wendyweiser.bsky.social
The court’s ruling does, however, seriously weaken the tools available to federal courts to enforce adherence to the law. In that way, it has emboldened executive abuse of power.
wendyweiser.bsky.social
Note that SCOTUS did not disturb the injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the EO as it applies to the parties to the lawsuit. There is nothing to suggest it
disagreed with the lower court’s ruling that the EO is unconstitutional.