Texas National Security Review
@tnsr.org
260 followers 50 following 180 posts
A rigorous, policy-relevant journal on national & international security, brought to you by The University of Texas System | tnsr.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
tnsr.org
The entirety of our fall issue is now on the TNSR website! We're tackling today's biggest strategic questions, from tech competition with China to the new nuclear era.

But first, we start with a foundational question from editor-in-chief Francis J. Gavin... 🧵
tnsr.org
The nuclear map extends globally. Our experts also unpack:

☢️ Proliferation risks in the Middle East

🛡️ Credibility challenges for NATO's nuclear posture

🌎 Latin America's role in the new nuclear era
tnsr.org
The roundtable dives deep into the Indo-Pacific, analyzing:

🇰🇵 North Korea's evolving nuclear strategy

🇨🇳 The domestic politics driving China's nuclear buildup

🇦🇺🇬🇧🇺🇸 How AUKUS is reshaping competition in Southern Asia
tnsr.org
In an age of constant analysis and information overload, what do national security experts really know?

Gavin’s introduction sets the stage, urging us to question our assumptions and think critically about the state of the world.

tnsr.org/2025/09/what...
What Do We Really Know? - Texas National Security Review
We are more confident about our world than we should be.
tnsr.org
tnsr.org
The entirety of our fall issue is now on the TNSR website! We're tackling today's biggest strategic questions, from tech competition with China to the new nuclear era.

But first, we start with a foundational question from editor-in-chief Francis J. Gavin... 🧵
tnsr.org
Chris Walsh from the George W. Bush Institute joined us for our most recent podcast episode and shared a long-term strategy to counter oppressive regimes by empowering the people they rule.
tnsr.org
Has US policy toward North Korea been a failure? In our latest podcast episode, Igor Khrestin and Chris Walsh from the George W. Bush Institute break down sanctions, trilateral security, and why human rights must be tied to policy moving forward.
"Addressing the North Korean Conundrum" with Igor Khrestin and Chris Walsh
tnsr.org
Thank you all for helping us continue this endeavor at The University of Texas at Austin! Our articles are alway free at TNSR.org, but if you prefer print issues, you can order those on the @utexaspress.bsky.social website. utpress.utexas.edu/journals/tex...
utpress.utexas.edu
tnsr.org
The TNSR leadership team recently met with our friends at @utexaspress.bsky.social, whose tireless efforts ensure that our work is published and distributed. We would also be remiss if we didn't acknowledge the support of our directors at the Clements Center and Strauss Center. Thank you!
Reposted by Texas National Security Review
stanfordcisac.bsky.social
A new roundtable by CISAC affiliate @laurensukin.bsky.social and Rohan Mukherjee examines the evolving global nuclear order, with several papers by former CISAC postdocs that show the interconnected nature of nuclear challenges and the vital role of domestic politics.
tnsr.org
Our latest roundtable examines the rapidly evolving global nuclear order. From North Korea to NATO, China to Latin America, this collection of essays explores the domestic and international forces reshaping nuclear security.

Full roundtable: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
Navigating the New Nuclear Map - Texas National Security Review
The global nuclear order is undergoing rapid and complex transformations, driven by the expansion of arsenals, evolving doctrines, and the interplay of domestic and international politics. This roundt...
tnsr.org
tnsr.org
How does Latin America’s nuclear-free zone offer lessons for global nonproliferation? @jluisrodriguez.com explores the region’s unique approach to managing nuclear risks.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"Latin America and Contemporary Nuclear Challenges" by J. Luis Rodriguez

Latin American approaches to managing nuclear risks emphasize communal efforts promoting arms control, disarmament, and the irreversibility of nuclear nonproliferation. For these countries, nuclear weapons are not necessary for their security but, instead, represent the primary source of nuclear risks, regardless of who possesses them or how a possessor behaves. As a result, these countries have decided not to acquire these arsenals—but this decision is not automatic. Latin American countries have used the regional and global nonproliferation regimes to lock in this calculus and secure their access to peaceful atomic technologies. It would be a mistake, however, to take these institutions for granted and assume that they will keep managing nuclear risk automatically. The regional approaches may face challenges stemming from the intrinsic difficulties of utilizing peaceful nuclear technologies, the modernization efforts of nuclear powers, and escalating geopolitical tensions among great powers, especially if arms races extend to Latin America.
tnsr.org
Does NATO have a credible nuclear deterrent—or does consensus decision-making undermine it? Jacklyn Majnemer dives into the tensions between credibility and alliance unity.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"A Nuclear Veto? The Credibility–Consensus Trade-Off and NATO Nuclear Use Procedures" by Jacklyn Majnemer

Do NATO allies have a veto over the use of American nuclear weapons stationed in Europe? While the alliance has publicly indicated that a NATO nuclear mission would require consensus approval from the Nuclear Planning Group, NATO allies have limited practical means to veto American unilateral use of these weapons. The authorization procedures within NATO for the use of American nuclear weapons stationed in Europe pose inherent trade-offs between credibility and consensus. Meaningful consensus decision-making undermines the credibility of the American nuclear weapons on European soil, but enhancing credibility raises the risk of American nuclear use emanating from Europe that is unwanted by NATO allies. Given the recent erosion of the security environment and allies’ trust in the US, there are reasons to think that the tension between credibility and consensus might become more salient within NATO.
tnsr.org
From Iran’s nuclear ambitions to great power competition over energy, this essay by @nicolegrajewski.bsky.social and Jane Darby Menton examines the complex nuclear dynamics shaping the Middle East and North Africa.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"MENA at the Threshold? Proliferation Risks and Great Power Competition" by Nicole Grajewski and Jane Darby Menton

This article situates the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) in the global nuclear order, emphasizing how the region has both challenged and spurred adaptations in international nuclear governance for decades. It then examines two pressing contemporary issues: the uncertain trajectory of Iran’s nuclear program after Israeli and US military strikes in June 2025, and the anticipated expansion of nuclear energy across MENA, which could also result in more countries with capabilities that would be conducive to pursuing the bomb. Both developments underscore the difficulties of managing nuclear latency in a conflict-prone region, where tensions among local actors inflect nuclear decision-making. While there are opportunities to mitigate these challenges, and principles that policymakers should follow in addressing them, nuclear aspirations are likely to remain a prominent feature of MENA’s security landscape so long as underlying tensions between regional actors remain unresolved.
tnsr.org
How is U.S.—China rivalry fueling a dangerous cascade of nuclear proliferation across Southern Asia? @debak.bsky.social explores the ripple effects of AUKUS and regional competition.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"Cascades of Competition: Southern Asia, the Indo-Pacific, and AUKUS" by Debak Das

Nuclear stability in Southern Asia is being shaped by different layers of competition in the Indo-Pacific. This article highlights two dynamics that are shaping nuclear competition in the region. The first, within Southern Asia, is states finding space to escalate at lower levels of conflict to address nuclear and military asymmetry. Pakistan is seeking to create space to escalate at lower levels of conflict against India, while India is doing the same against Pakistan on one side and China on the other. The second dynamic is a cascade of reactionary vertical proliferation that is occurring in the Indo-Pacific as a result of China and the United States’ strategic competition. While Washington and Beijing are responding to each other’s nuclear arsenals, India is responding to China’s arsenal, and Pakistan is responding to India’s nuclear modernization. The technology transfers and submarine proliferation in the Indo-Pacific precipitated by AUKUS are intensifying this dynamic.
tnsr.org
China’s nuclear expansion isn’t just about strategy—it’s deeply tied to domestic politics under Xi Jinping. Learn how centralization and internal priorities are shaping Beijing’s nuclear decisions in this essay by Nicola Leveringhaus.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"The Domestic Politics Behind China’s Strategic Force Improvements" by Nicola Leveringhaus

China’s nuclear expansion is occurring at a time of major domestic political change, with implications for its nuclear weapons strategy. Domestic changes of note include defense reforms, a contraction and politicization of China’s strategic community, as well as sustained top-down interest in commemoration of China’s nuclear weapons past, such as the “Two Bombs, One Satellite” program. These domestic political changes represent an unprecedented elevation of the national, social, and political value of China’s nuclear weapons by the CCP in the Xi era. How should others in the region and beyond best respond to these changes? The article ends with some thoughts on foreign state engagement with China as Beijing expands and elevates the domestic importance of its nuclear arsenal.
tnsr.org
Why is South Korea losing confidence in U.S. extended deterrence? @doyoung-lee.bsky.social unpacks how Pyongyang’s aggressive nuclear posture is driving a wedge between allies.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"Growing Divergence: North Korea’s Evolving Nuclear Strategy and the US–South Korea Alliance" by Do Young Lee

In response to North Korea’s escalating nuclear and missile threats, the US and South Korea have taken measures to reinforce extended deterrence: the Washington Declaration, the Nuclear Consultative Group, and the enhanced visibility of US strategic assets around the Korean Peninsula. Despite these steps, South Korea’s public confidence in US extended deterrence commitments has declined. This article argues that this decline is rooted in growing divergence between US and South Korean interpretations of North Korea’s evolving nuclear strategy and the appropriate responses to it.
tnsr.org
How are alliances like AUKUS and cooperation between Russia, China, and North Korea reshaping the nuclear order? @laurensukin.bsky.social and @rohanmukherjee.bsky.social introduce the essays and explore the effects of domestic politics and global competition.

📖 Read here: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
"The Evolving Global Landscape of Nuclear Security" by Lauren Sukin and Rohan Mukherjee
tnsr.org
Our latest roundtable examines the rapidly evolving global nuclear order. From North Korea to NATO, China to Latin America, this collection of essays explores the domestic and international forces reshaping nuclear security.

Full roundtable: tnsr.org/roundtable/n...
Navigating the New Nuclear Map - Texas National Security Review
The global nuclear order is undergoing rapid and complex transformations, driven by the expansion of arsenals, evolving doctrines, and the interplay of domestic and international politics. This roundt...
tnsr.org