𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗲
@sonofpharaohs.bsky.social
720 followers 870 following 3.6K posts
❝I’m in 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐋 now. I am 𝐃𝐎𝐂𝐓𝐎𝐑 𝐅𝐀𝐓𝐄.❞ — 𝙀𝘼𝙍𝙏𝙃’𝙎 𝘼𝙂𝙀𝙉𝙏 𝙊𝙁 𝙊𝙍𝘿𝙀𝙍— (roleplay/parody) RP account. Mun: 29.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
— also try & ask in GOOD FAITH given being fussy about it was not the direction intended.
He understands his point, being that he is a sorcerer, but he will remind him: it was Vigilante who began this disputation & he is not bothered by him not understanding speech that may not be transparent nor the request.

He will remind him of the solution and then also add that he should —
everyone has the same capacity to understand subject speech, then get pissed when tonal changes and inflections get missed, or angry when clarification and transparency is asked, as if it's some sort of inconvenience.

That's all. Do you wanna hear a fun crow fact instead? I'm getting fussy.
“ The silence & avoiding of eye contact is definitely speaking for itself.” He remarked.
Caelina didn’t say anything, but she didn’t look at him either — and rightly so, she had no intention of defending herself.
“ I see. I would be surprise but something about that day tells me you weren’t the damsel Í beiieved you were in that situation.”
He stopped Duchess with a hand wave telekinetically, floating up. “Looks like our decision has been made.”

He sits her back onto the floor. He then levitates to her. “Alright, girl. I’m about to teach you some magic of your own….”
"Please. She's just a lap puppy. I didn't need legs anyway."

She's joking. She's jok-

And Duchess is jumping onto her lap again.
“ Want her to sit on you again & re-evaluate that idea?”
He twirls his finger, helping it slide back into place & shrinks it just enough to fit her with magic.
“ Want her to sit on you again & re-evaluate that idea?”
"That's a thing!? I was fully committed to a whole Clifford situation!"
“ Pretty close. Teach her how to change between a more manageable form & her true form.”
Reposted by 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗲
“ Pretty close. Teach her how to change between a more manageable form & her true form.”
"Turn her back into a puppy?"
“ She has grown quite big since you first took her in. It’s probably hard to manage her like you use to.” He remarked.

“ I might have a solution for you.”
— The ‘solution’ would not be to limit or expect others to abide by arbitrary rules towards ‘transparent speech’ just like he opposes the expectation others to understand the previous concepts mention.

A better solution would instead to be ask questions & clarity when confused & be open.
We can also acknowledge that language & communication can also be complex, complicated, and nuanced.

What he speaks of works both ways; being inclusive would STILL require an understanding that subjective speech would include hyperboles, metaphors, and speech he would deem ‘not transparent’. —
...

Or maybe we should all think that conversation and how people understand language is subjective to their own personal experiences and that not everyone can understand literary devices such as conversational implicatures, sarcasm or metaphors. Maybe we should all strive for a more inclusive +
Well apparently you don’t when they’re exaggerating & you want to place the onus on them.

Dunno what else to tell ya.
So you can understand & connect with people without confusion. Also, that’s just you & not even a good flex.
Why should I have to examine a situation? If we're having a conversation, I'm taking all that's said at face value, because why would someone say something they don't mean? I /would/ kill someone for a bowl of cereal, I don't know how that's incredulous.
Examine context of the situation. Incredulous statements like ‘ I’d kill’ for something as trivial as a bowl of cereal ususlly is a big indicator & you rather be wrong on that.
Examine context of the situation. Incredulous statements like ‘ I’d kill’ for something as trivial as a bowl of cereal ususlly is a big indicator & you rather be wrong on that.
See, that pisses me off.language not having set rules, how am I to know what someone really means if they say something that's the complete opposite? It's disingenuous!

Like, if someone says, 'ugh, I'd kill for a bowl of Frosted Flakes', I'd take it as someone would kill for a bowl of Frosted +
It caused YOU confusion. Language does not have set rules & humans have made exaggerations since the beginning of the for dramatic effect.
The more she knows.
OH. She understands now.
He would explain to Mary that most people whose response is ‘your mom’ is usually messing with people & theyre not serious.
He would explain to Mary that most people whose response is ‘your mom’ is usually messing with people & theyre not serious.
Reposted by 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗲
“Are you seriously fishing for attention with your ass? How childish…”

Anyways! Who wants to see her ass?
. . .

wow.

i thought my ass was nice.
Reposted by 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗮𝘁𝗲