🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
banner
sevenatnight.bsky.social
🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
@sevenatnight.bsky.social
310 followers 670 following 120 posts
THE SEX UPDATE Artist. NSFW (NO MINORS). Main account for other stuff Im new to this, bare with me If you can~
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by 🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
Lesbian Sparks 🏳️‍⚧️

Miles takes Cherry for a sweet Ride. #ocsky
Lesbian Sparks 🏳️‍⚧️

Miles takes Cherry for a sweet Ride. #ocsky
Reposted by 🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
Reposted by 🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
This is a BAD idea from a tactical pov

all this means is an issue that bsky mods do NOT want controversy around will have NO posting about it for a full week

a large number of people who come back from the "blackout" will likely not start up the complaints again

it hamstrings the cause
Twitter is run by fascists worse than Bluesky. They legit fund america's anti-trans media. They need no justifications.
Reposted by 🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
Hex Maniac from legally trademarked Pockeymon
That's what it says, but to whom? Its very very vague. It needs to specify it clearly. Some people see pink handcuffs as non consensual stuff. That means if bluesky says so, they can kill an account just for posting what they *think* is non consensual.
Lolicon is pedophilia. Ava Tyson is proof. Stop hijacking a narrative to support child exploitation. That will cause them to double down.
It fr needs a different name because its sounds worse than it is. Idk why people are attacking me. Im against this vague placement that will allow people in charge to bend the rules.
There can be a base standard. Issue is, Puritans think they know it.

I think you misread, Im totally against this shit.
If you continue to justify Lolicon, Bluesky will 100% double down on this vague rule and kill us actually good NSFW people off.

Fuck off pedos.
Loli-pedos are gonna try and hijack this one, and already are in my comments doing so.

If you look at pictures of kids in a sexual light real or fictional, that's morally incorrect. Good job for missing the point.

Ava Tyson started with Loli's ended in child exploitation. End of discussion.
Reposted by 🔞Seven Afterdark (COMMISSIONS OPEN) 🔞
There’s an artist whose name escapes me currently who has a cute little “I consent” speech bubble in the corner of every piece they make. I honestly love it and it’s cute as fuck BUT HERES THE THING.

By having that, they can legally state “oh no it’s consensual” EVEN IF WE ALL KNOW IT ISNT.
I feel like the best way to decide here is:

Are their any clear depictions of people in distress or obvious non-consensual behavior? For me? No. These images do not break the rules. But if someone thinks this is worthy of a ban when there is NO CLEAR SIGNS OF NONCONSENT, you are cooked.🫠
Don't forget to love yourself too! stay safe.
This could be a cool failsafe. Hmm. Might have to adopt my own.
This just means I have to make a Spicy alt on Newgrounds right? So I can post Robo-pussy?