Seva Khusid
@sevakhusid.bsky.social
130 followers 200 following 500 posts
οἴμοι From Classics & Philosophy into making indie games. Play my latest jam entry: https://vsevolod-khusid.itch.io/plan-e-t Or visit my website to see what's cooking: https://www.sevakhusid.games/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
sevakhusid.bsky.social
The winter has been productive. After the prototype for the Burning Sky, I have spent two months working for the studio Trioskaz on a project that I am very excited for.
(Trioskaz: trioskazgames.tilda.ws)
Trioskaz
Game Studio
trioskazgames.tilda.ws
sevakhusid.bsky.social
Congratulations!
Try to keep at that, it gets worse quickly after.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
But if we go naive Gorkian, we just open up the way towards the eleventh Chaos god, Graham Priest, since the explicit and, most certainly, implicit Gork-significant beliefs will create all kinds of contradictions.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
But is it real-world folkloric and real in-universe, or is it diegetic folklore and brass has nothing to do with anti-magic? Or is it a Gorkian realization of mass belief?
sevakhusid.bsky.social
Even with a finite number of both, it only took them a negligible 85 million years this time
sevakhusid.bsky.social
On the one hand, yes
On the other, Brass Citadel feels decidedly more brass than the idea of brass, no?
sevakhusid.bsky.social
This sort of reply puts into question the myths about Khorne -- the size of the throne is as heretical as Shi'ur Qomah, the Skarbrand fable is but a metaphor -- and implies that WH40k runs on metaphysics far more interesting than anything they actually write. Would that GW had their own Kirkbride!..
sevakhusid.bsky.social
Anyhow, I wouldn't trust K.'s conclusions, but his instinct is impeccable. Arguments via astronomy (so underappreciated in the field! At least the study of Mithraism seems to have circled back to it), parallels, immense erudition.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
All in all, now *that part* of Kerenyi's argument reads as more legitimate, maybe even close to the truth. An aside: K. was a close associate of Jung and shared a habit of taking a handful of reasonable steps towards a wildly overzealous conclusion (see e.g. their Essays on a Science of Mythology)
sevakhusid.bsky.social
So, the bulls and the snakes are confusing here, but Kerenyi could point to the phrase, if it is relevant to the Mycenaean Greece -- a bit over a millennium away from these accounts.
Yet the same Athenagoras quotes Orphic verse, sufficiently coherent with the Derveni text: continuity over 500 years.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
The version of Athenagoras has two serpent-births. Both Rhea and Zeus are transformed and produce a horned, possibly-bovine Persephone. Even then, as the cow-Persephone births Dionysus, D. is not serpentine. And the symbolum does not work either, unless it got streamlined to use all-male forms.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
The ritual practice seems to be clear enough: a serpent effigy passed through the clothes of an initiate until it leaves from the bottom. (I couldn't confirm if it was gender-exclusive though!) So, the serpent-father obtains, but I am still confused by the bull fathering the serpent.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
So, as the Christian authors focus on the myth that Zeus rapes first his own mother Demeter/Rhea (in the form of a bull or a serpent), produces Persephone (on one account, with a second, horned bestial head -- cow?), and then rapes her in the form of a serpent, we cannot be sure in their retellings.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
De Jauregui also notes a third apologist, Firmicus, who "calls the two lines about the bull and the serpent a symbolum", a way to assert faith in the cult. In Firmicus, other symbola of this cult take a modernized and streamlined form, implying some loss of understanding even by the actual mystics.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
But when taken with the mention of Ceres, it can finally be found in two places: Clement of Alexandria, and later a more obscure Christian apologist Arnobius. Both relate the phrase as a generally-known poetic expression.
(pp.155-156 in Orphism & Christianity in Late Antiquity, MH de Jauregui, 2010)
ia801009.us.archive.org
sevakhusid.bsky.social
"In the mysteries of Ceres and Proserpine, the grand secret communicated to the initiated was thus enigmatically expressed: Taurus Draconem genuit, et Taurum Draco; <...> The bull, as already seen, was a prominent emblem of generative force, the Bacchus Zagreus,..."

BUT NO ATTRIBUTION AGAIN
sevakhusid.bsky.social
I first stumble upon a 1889 Anonymous and self-published (!) treatise Opholatreia, on the worship of snakes in human culture. It is itself a secondary text to

'one already issued bearing the title “Phallism.” '

And lo, there is the line:
Ophiolateria, or Serpent Worship—A Project Gutenberg eBook
www.gutenberg.org
sevakhusid.bsky.social
And it's impressive, and later on Carl Jung would go on to use it in his entirely non-academic activities, and it has no clear attribution. And so I haven't been able to find a justification to use it.

UNTIL 13 HOURS AGO
sevakhusid.bsky.social
In his book on Dionysus, Kerenyi says (broad strokes) that Cretan Dionysus was a bull-son of snake-Zeus. He has good superficial evidence, but his real heavy-hitter is a line from some cultic source:

The bull has begotten a serpent, and the serpent a bull.
Taurus draconem genuit et taurum draco.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
There are three lines that haunted me, all found in K. Kerenyi, a good mythologist and a widely overreaching philologist.

One is in the quoted post -- an obscure name of Prometheus.
Another is one Iachim, allegedly an Egyptian priest.
The third one I just managed to chase up.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
my personal white whale
sevakhusid.bsky.social
These memes convince me there is only one type of gamer worth designing for

bsky.app/profile/null...
nullconvention.bsky.social
I would basically do anything the woman on the right asked me to do.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
Bloodborne 2 early announcement campaign is wild
sevakhusid.bsky.social
ah yes, the distant relative of Ivan Maksimovich Poddubniy — note the familial mustache
sevakhusid.bsky.social
It’s only blood libel if they portray it as essential to the religion. Otherwise it’s just sparkling antisemitism.
sevakhusid.bsky.social
(probably shouldn't be giving them ideas)
sevakhusid.bsky.social
At this point I am just waiting for the meme to do a full circle back to blood libel