Chris McCoy
@scipiogemini.bsky.social
640 followers 420 following 820 posts
he/him/his, Gen X, queer, poly, socialist, communist, atheist/polytheist. If you're following me for something profound, I will let you down frequently. Free Palestine.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
The vast majority of people will never care about an issue untill they are personally affected. Some people will start caring when a loved one is harmed, but for most people, it will take impacting them directly.
Stephen Miller's face incites violence and terror.
I'll take "If there are no consequences for breaking the law, are we really a nation of laws?" for $200.
Grijalva doesn't even need Johnson to swear her in. Any Federal Judge in the country can swear in a member of Congress.

Every day that Grijalva doesn't take advantage of that remedy shows that this is all performative.
Federal Judges Help Swear In Members of Congress
In regions around the country, members of Congress turned to federal judges to take public oaths of office in their home districts. The representatives earlier had taken official oaths in Washington w...
www.uscourts.gov
Any Federal Judge can swear in a member of Congress. You don't need Speaker Johnson to swear you in. Bypass him entirely. I'm sure there are 3 women in a certain federal court in DC that would love to do the honor.
Federal Judges Help Swear In Members of Congress
In regions around the country, members of Congress turned to federal judges to take public oaths of office in their home districts. The representatives earlier had taken official oaths in Washington w...
www.uscourts.gov
All 6 of the Republican judges (they don't deserve the title justice) must be impeached for the crime of treason against the Constitution and the American public.
The case is submitted.

My prediction is that Section 2 is overturned, 6-3 Kav majority, saying that the Section 2 still *exists* but isn't allowed to do anything.
When I say that the plan to just wait for the 2026 mid-terms and hope for the best was a mistake, this is what I am referring to.

Irrevocable damage is already being done every day.

It will take generations to rebuild what this administration has demolished in mere months.
Because the billionaire owners of every main stream media outlet are profiting off this administration. Why would they risk that?
This administration is finally forcing white, moderate America to face the ugly truth that we are not a "nation of laws", we are a nation of privileges, which can be revoked from anyone, at any time, for any reason.
There isn’t another side to the argument. Every actor in the system—from defense attorneys to Justices on the Supreme Court—recognizes what is happening. The only question is how the criminal justice system should respond.”

open.substack.com/pub/harrylit...
The Irredeemable DOJ
Why James has an even stronger case of selective prosecution than Comey.
open.substack.com
Unfortunately for us, their best "interest" is cruelty. They didn't vote for him because they thought they would personally gain. They voted for him because other people would suffer, and for them, that was a better offer.
Reposted by Chris McCoy
Waiting untill the midterms to regain control was always going to be a losing strategy.

Even if we do manage to regain the House or the Senate in 2027, the damage is already done.

It will take literal generations to rebuild what they destroyed in months. (2/2)
Reposted by Chris McCoy
When Trump said "Drain the Swamp" he never meant "End Corruption in Government".

He always meant "Destroy the Institutions of Government".

Every day the Trump Regime remains in power, they accomplish more of their goal of completely destroying the federal government. (1/2)
Waiting untill the midterms to regain control was always going to be a losing strategy.

Even if we do manage to regain the House or the Senate in 2027, the damage is already done.

It will take literal generations to rebuild what they destroyed in months. (2/2)
When Trump said "Drain the Swamp" he never meant "End Corruption in Government".

He always meant "Destroy the Institutions of Government".

Every day the Trump Regime remains in power, they accomplish more of their goal of completely destroying the federal government. (1/2)
People seen to think telling LEOs that you know your rights is like some magic wand where they'll immediately stop violating your rights. Which isn't true.

The most important right people need to know when dealing with all cops is to shut the fuck up. Everything you say will be used against you.
It's been broken (dead) since October 7, 1996.
You can tell the agents that they don't have the right to arrest you while they're arresting you. They won't care. If you're lucky, you can sue them after. Assuming you can afford a lawyer.

Also, SCOTUS ruled that "probable cause" is whatever they want it to be.
The Supreme Court clears the way for ICE agents to treat race as grounds for immigration stops
As ICE immigration enforcement intensifies across the country, a Supreme Court ruling permits racial profiling as grounds for immigration stops.
www.npr.org
You can certainly attempt to exercise your constitutional rights. They will simply exercise their ability to make you wait as long as they think they can get away with before "releasing"you. Expect that to be several hours of you waiting in the back of a DHS vehicle without A/C, water, or a restroom
Chicago is on the coast of Lake Michigan, which is a border with Canada (see image below from the ACLU).

However, the above story is from Portland, Oregon, which is on the Pacific Coast, which is also a border.
Map of the United States showing a thick red border depicting the 100 miles from every border that DHS claims as jurisdiction. Text on the image says "Nearly 2 out of 3 people live within the 100 mile border zone".
Every coast line is technically a "border" and DHS has the right to arrest anyone within 100 miles of the border, for any reason. They can also search any vehicle for any reason without a warrant within 100 miles of any border.

But also, since when have ICE ever cared about laws?
Grand Juries do not have the defense attorney present to question potential jurors and remove jurors with obvious bias against the defendant, or refute any evidence presented.
Q: "Do you not care about the 1st Amendment?"

A: Only as it applies to them, personally. They couldn't care less about the rights of other people. They view rights like they view everything else in life, like pie - in order for them to have any, everyone else must have less (or, preferably, none).
I couldn't care less about the opinions on obesity or the "Temple of my Soul" from a person who supports the current occupant of the White House, who is obese and has no soul.
That is the crux of why we are where we are as a nation. The vast majority of people will never care about any issue until they are personally harmed by it.

The only way to get enough people to care is to make it so that as many people are affected as possible.
It means that they're not being cruel for some mysterious/secret reason that will be revealed at some later date which would make it all make sense

It means they're being cruel because they enjoy being cruel. They love making other people suffer. They take joy in the pain of others.