Spooky Adult Paul OBE(S)
@sanjukta.bsky.social
5.9K followers 570 following 3.7K posts
Interested in the idea and practice and law of economic coordination. I work as a law professor at a public university.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Spooky Adult Paul OBE(S)
lake-michigan.live
Current* conditions near Milwaukee, WI:
Rotating view of Milwaukee and Lake Michigan located north of downtown Milwaukee along the Milwaukee River. // Image captured at: 2025-10-14 04:41:54 UTC (about 25 min. prior to this post) // Current Temp in Milwaukee: 53.78 F | 12.10 C // Precip: fog // Wind: NW at 3.444 mph | 5.54 kph // Humidity: 95%
sanjukta.bsky.social
*of course production costs and demand are themselves not entirely independent of acts of the producers/financiers/etc - but components of them are, and they are not all controlled by any one actor
sanjukta.bsky.social
We should talk less about "market forces" imho and more about dynamic, comparative constraints on economic decision-making & coordination. There are constraints -costs and demand, mainly*- and those constraints change, and they are often comparative in nature. But they don't need to be mystified.
sanjukta.bsky.social
You need to do better if you have truly convinced yourself, against all basic common sense, that biden was politically *foreclosed* from taking an action that would have made him a hero and found support in federal law (not to mention morals)

And gooodbye now - you don't get to randomly be a jerk
sanjukta.bsky.social
However, I have to finish reading my book and go to bed good night
sanjukta.bsky.social
Of course trump is in another category altogether. That doesn't mean that biden would have been removed for reconciling conflicting federal laws in a way that saved a massive number of lives and prevented an untold amount of suffering. Actually he would have gained politically.
sanjukta.bsky.social
It is wrong to compare that situation to trump openly bucking clear law and impounding funds.
sanjukta.bsky.social
Looks like this has already been covered above (i can't seem to link the tweet). By the way, even if this weren't true, it would at best mean that two pieces of federal law are in conflict. The bill you're referencing doesn't have some automatic supremacy over the other federal laws involved.
sanjukta.bsky.social
Did that legislation pass the senate? (No, obvs) Is it your position that symbolic action by house republicans binds a Democratic president? (Absurd)

And he did not need some specific authorization from senate democrats to conduct foreign policy, of course
sanjukta.bsky.social
Your position is that the courts or congress stopped Biden?
sanjukta.bsky.social
It is hard for me not to see it as a moment of perfection of english supremacy (with many precedents, and among other things) - which is of interest (to me) mainly in relation to the universalizing impulse of the common law and the universalizing impulse of classical political economy (to come)
sanjukta.bsky.social
I mean I obviously defer to you; I'm just a consumer of information here. (Tho I think existence of scottish support for glorious revolution - of course well known to coexist with strong opposition - doesn't itself undermine point). Still, good to know.
sanjukta.bsky.social
I know less about pavlou but also all of these people seem profoundly unwell in various ways (which of course doesn't mean they aren't also dramatizing a political phenomenon)
sanjukta.bsky.social
Anyway maybe this is obvious to others, but futures trading originated also as a mechanism for stabilization of a market (grain) prone to ruinous competition at harvest time
sanjukta.bsky.social
It's amazing to consider that the origins of this system were in part to rationalize the grain trade in a way that in a later age might have been viewed as borderline anti-competitive (indeed see the famous brandeis opinion in CBOT, defending stabilization measures through the board)
sanjukta.bsky.social
I highly recommend jonathan lurie's history of the chicago board of trade (1979)
sanjukta.bsky.social
Understood. Though not felt as anti authoritarian in ireland or scotland I imagine.
sanjukta.bsky.social
What I mean is that that is a lot to contemplate.
sanjukta.bsky.social
It's really something to contemplate that our legal tradition (the common law) is bound up in a revolutionary event that was not only anti-Catholic but also about English supremacy (over scotland & ireland)
Reposted by Spooky Adult Paul OBE(S)
henrysnow.bsky.social
oh my goodness this is such an interesting subject, how did I not learn about this in history school. now my students are definitely going to
sanjukta.bsky.social
How is it that I did not learn about Courts of Piepowder in law school?
sanjukta.bsky.social
How is it that I did not learn about Courts of Piepowder in law school?
sanjukta.bsky.social
I feel like I should be able to take a course about the law merchant. If AI were real, it would be able to generate this.