salcuris.bsky.social
@salcuris.bsky.social
1 followers 2 following 120 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Their identity has been redefined, their rights are focus of a legislative agenda that's squishy on forward-thinking (at best), their right to hold beliefs untrammelled by government influence is before the courts, and their main opposition appears to be young Americans who read at a 6th grade level
To achieve unity, one must compromise. In what ways have you compromised your policy positions?
Which of your political standards will you be changing to achieve unity?
"Intentionally choosing", "They want" concern motivation.

I'm quoting you. (It was "to look smart", however)

That's why I'm offering testimony, so you don't have to rely on belief.

okiedokes
You're interested in what motivates me. You believe it's "too sound smart". I replied that I'm motivated by finding out what others know/think. I offered an invitation to show you what I found satisfying about my conversation.
I'm motivated by testing my thoughts through debate. In this case, to test how well informed they are on issues they raise. We can go through it you like.
I'm not responsible for the way you react or interpret. It sounds like you've an issue with learning that is expressing itself defensively as anti-intellectualism. That's regrettable, but entirely not my problem. How you react arises from within yourself.
No, sorry. I've just lost interest (the show I was binging has finished. Slow Horse, very, very good).
There's nothing wrong with having a large vocabulary. It's a skill that enriches the world with wonderfully intricate layers of meaning.
Yes, I did. There are words that follow the word 'dream'. Those words are important.

(Don't worry about the "agreeing with the Nazis bit, that was going somewhere, but I haven't the time)

Read the Wikipedia page on The Holocaust. It's too important to have you going around being ill-informed.
That is an issue for those who feel passionately about the subject, not I.
How does it work? Allow me to explain, you agreed when you typed "Exactly."
I read agreements for transwoman, trans-woman, and trans women.
So a couple of things here,

1) When you agree with what I say and then show that you didn't understand what I wrote, it isn't a sign of competence.

2) You are agreeing with the Nazis view on gender.
Strangely enough, I've seen it argued all three ways. I'm happy to use whichever.
No, thank you. You can continue with showing how Rowling is to the right of Trump, or explaining how the Holocaust and Shoah are separate events if you like.
I'm sorry, but I'll have to end this discussion here. You appear not to have a working understanding of the word 'term', and it's rather important to my point.
That's fair. Her explanation was published to her website.
hadn't read it and asked for a link.
"...her explanation regarding that tweet."

The explanation concerns a tweet. You're assuming that the explanation is also on Twitter. It isn't. You would know this if you'd read it.

Why did you feel the need to lie about something you had no knowledge about? You could simply have said you 1/2