Their identity has been redefined, their rights are focus of a legislative agenda that's squishy on forward-thinking (at best), their right to hold beliefs untrammelled by government influence is before the courts, and their main opposition appears to be young Americans who read at a 6th grade level
You're interested in what motivates me. You believe it's "too sound smart". I replied that I'm motivated by finding out what others know/think. I offered an invitation to show you what I found satisfying about my conversation.
I'm motivated by testing my thoughts through debate. In this case, to test how well informed they are on issues they raise. We can go through it you like.
I'm not responsible for the way you react or interpret. It sounds like you've an issue with learning that is expressing itself defensively as anti-intellectualism. That's regrettable, but entirely not my problem. How you react arises from within yourself.
No, thank you. You can continue with showing how Rowling is to the right of Trump, or explaining how the Holocaust and Shoah are separate events if you like.
I'm sorry, but I'll have to end this discussion here. You appear not to have a working understanding of the word 'term', and it's rather important to my point.