Franklin Ratliff
rocketplane.bsky.social
Franklin Ratliff
@rocketplane.bsky.social
450 followers 730 following 2.5K posts
Chief Technology Officer for Titans Space Industries
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
In this speech Alan Watts describes a lot of the people we see in the Musk Space community. www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9fs...
www.youtube.com
1952. Von Braun design. Same height as Starship HLS. Sensible landing gear design.
1952. Von Braun design. Same height as Starship HLS. Sensible landing gear design.
1952. Von Braun design. Same height as Starship HLS. Sensible landing gear design.
1952. Von Braun design. Same height as Starship HLS. Sensible landing gear design.
1952. Von Braun design. Same height as Starship HLS. Sensible landing gear design.
Idea this thing can land on anything other than flat prepared surfaces is delusional. Let's say Starship HLS masses 240,000 lbs in earth gravity. That's 40,000 lbs in lunar gravity. Works out to 10,000 lbs per landing gear pad. Landing gear pads are idiotically small. Landing gear suicidally narrow.
Astronauts need the visibility to manually land a lunar lander in an emergency, not just a stupid scheme only using screens. (Design by Philip Bono, Douglas Aircraft)
There is no debate about 3I/Atlas in the space science community. This whole "debate" is a contrivance of the crackpot/science illiterate/grifter community. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Envv...
Natural or Artificial? The 3I Atlas Debate You Need to Understand
YouTube video by Ellie in Space
www.youtube.com
Astronauts need the visibility to manually land a lunar lander in an emergency, not just a stupid scheme only using screens. (Design by Philip Bono, Douglas Aircraft)
Astronauts need the visibility to manually land a lunar lander in an emergency, not just a stupid scheme only using screens. (Design by Philip Bono, Douglas Aircraft)
Astronauts need the visibility to manually land a lunar lander in an emergency, not just a stupid scheme only using screens. (Design by Philip Bono, Douglas Aircraft)
Astronauts need the visibility to manually land a lunar lander in an emergency, not just a stupid scheme only using screens. (Design by Philip Bono, Douglas Aircraft)
Idea this thing can land on anything other than a flat prepared surface is absurd. Let's say Starship HLS masses 240,000 lbs in earth gravity. That's 40,000 lbs in lunar gravity. That's 10,000 lbs per landing gear pad. Idiotically small landing gear pads. Suicidally narrow landing gear.
Idea this thing can land on anything other than a flat prepared surface is absurd. Let's say Starship HLS masses 240,000 lbs in earth gravity. That's 40,000 lbs in lunar gravity. That's 10,000 lbs per landing gear pad. Idiotically small landing gear pads. Suicidally narrow landing gear.
Turned out to be debris from a weather balloon.
Idea this thing can land on anything other than a flat prepared surface is absurd. Let's say Starship HLS masses 240,000 lbs in earth gravity. That's 40,000 lbs in lunar gravity. That's 10,000 lbs per landing gear pad. Idiotically small landing gear pads. Suicidally narrow landing gear.
Idea this thing can land on anything other than a flat prepared surface is absurd. Let's say Starship HLS masses 240,000 lbs in earth gravity. That's 40,000 lbs in lunar gravity. That's 10,000 lbs per landing gear pad. Idiotically small landing gear pads. Suicidally narrow landing gear.
Late thirties and early forties. Kind of equal parts Heinlein and Asimov, although on reread Asimov was much more inventive.
This is just science fiction. And more like forties space opera science fiction at that.
Feudalism only ruled the Old World, not the Americas.
There is no debate about 3I/Atlas in the space science community. This whole "debate" is a contrivance of the crackpot/science illiterate/grifter community. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Envv...
Natural or Artificial? The 3I Atlas Debate You Need to Understand
YouTube video by Ellie in Space
www.youtube.com
This is barely even science fiction. It's more like science fantasy.