Aldia (Dee)
@profaneannalist.bsky.social
570 followers 280 following 12K posts
Alleged author. Plural Prophet of the Red Mothers. Schizophrenic. Communist. Lesbian. 🔞 She/her, it/its, xe/xyr. 29 Discord: ProfaneAnnalist#5789
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Reminder! I have a brand new book out at the usual links! (Below!)

The Red Dream is experimental fiction, the first of a three-part series dealing with schizoprenia, religion, and trauma

aldia19.itch.io

www.amazon.com/s?i=stripboo...
Aldia Elwood
aldia19.itch.io
I dont think any of us are ready for when deltarune does some kind of explicit Homestuck crossover thing.

Given the increasing collaboration, seems a little inevitable, I don't know
Reposted by Aldia (Dee)
Today for @theverge.com, I talk about transfem narratives: the epistemic lockout from mainstream publishing, the advantages and pitfalls of the self-pub model, and what a global transmisogynistic panic implies for our ability to make our voices heard and represent our own lives and worlds.
Trans women are building their own publishing world, and it’s under threat
Online communities are stepping in where traditional publishing stops.
www.theverge.com
A trans canon is worth a thousand headcanons.
MSPA spokesperson says sure, why not, Karkat is on estrogen.

A thousand people get angry and insist shes on T.

It's just very annoying.
Trans women should be allowed.
Trans women should be allowed.
People do understand that Kankri is a specific caricature of a particular kind of MRA misogynist, no?
I need bodywriting implements.
Maybe? But again, its universal among the ancestors and all adult trolls shown.
Yeah. This is the thing that irks me. People will bring up someone's politics circa 1919 as proof of them being some existential threat. Despite that being unrelated to the charges against them.

But, for some reason, bringing up the odiousness of Beria is considered irrelevant.
. . . I'm sorry, I could be misunderstanding, but I thought the renderings of adult trolls always appeared darker and without defined eyes because they developed a thicker layer of chitin as part of some metamorphosis.

Is it just silhouetting?

The Condesce only appears in such a manner.
false pretenses by an increasingly paranoid NKVD fueled by the rape of children.
My hot take on Nikolai Bukharin is that you can believe he was fundamentally a "right-com" while acknowledging that the accusations of collaboration with Nazi agents are ludicrous, and he didn't deserve to be killed.

He was not killed for being a proto-Dengist or whatever, he was killed under
Earwigs are such little guys, always feels rude to move them.
Morrison maintains this wasn't the case, but also change their story frequently about the whole thing, so I'm inclined to believe Moore in this instance.
very "brand-first", an attitude which some find understandably grating.
People seem confused about the Moore v. Morrison thing, and no, it's not a factional wizard duel.

Morrison was just very publicly rude to Moore for no real reason and things spiraled from there. Morrison called it publicity-building trash talk, which aligns with their tendency to think
This is, unfortunately, very on-brand for them.

Theyve always been bizarrely naive when it comes to, well, most things.

I doubt they did this for a paycheck, they are very principled, their principles just aren't developed from any interaction with the actual, existing world.
The thing about Grant Morrison is this sort of solipsistic, high-concept low-detail thinking is what happens when you have no adequate framework to understand the world.

They taught sigilcraft to a bunch of rich libertarians because they're gullible and think we live in the ideal realm of thought.
Oh, so we finished The Familiar Volume 3: Honeysuckle and Pain.

This one was a little slower. I suppose a consequence of planning a 27 book series.

But goodness, the ending.
I am pleased that Hussie is continuing the bit of, "Alternia was only exceptionally horrible because of a single, all-powerful pedophile."
Oh, everyone seems exaggerated and the character arca stalled?

Oh, some conflict seems artificial and this character is just acting out to cause drama?

Maybe that's, in fact, deliberately the point and signposted by the Epilogues.
I feel like if people would actually understand the Epilogues, things would go smoother.

This or that character doesn't align with your understanding of them? That's because it's post-canon. And, well, not written by the clown who wrote the original, but that's sort of meta.
Specificity is not a narrowing, but an expansion of analysis

To analyze the specific conditions of the Black proletarian or the transsexual proletarian or the gay proletarian is not "dividing the working class", but deepening our understanding of it
I like to tentacle-fuck my headmate n moirrail in the buuuuuutt.
i wonder how much secondhand embarrassment we can give church girl with our notifs