Paul Thistoll
@pault.bsky.social
2.4K followers 4.3K following 620 posts
Human Rights Defender / Founder of Rights Aotearoa @rightsaotearoa.bsky.social || he/him || Proud alumnus of London Business School || ❤️Food & Wine || Trans rights are human rights
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
pault.bsky.social
I think I know what it is.......But I am not involved in any way.
pault.bsky.social
🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿👀👀👀👀?

Sean Plunket
@SeanPlunket
It seems after 3 years the wokesters are coming for us. Get ready to fight for freedom.
Quote
The Platform NZ
@theplatform_nz
·
2h
The Platform will resist any attempt by agencies of state to censor, restrict or inhibit the freedom of speech of its hosts, guests or audience. Watch this space!
pault.bsky.social
oh this is nice. Will look into it.
pault.bsky.social
Here are my prepared remarks - I won't speak to all of my content as it's slightly too long.

The eagle-eyed amongst you will see that Rights Aotearoa has updated its house font from Helvetica Neue to Helvetica Now.
Kia ora koutou katoa Ms Belich and honourable committee members,
1. I am Paul Thistoll, CEO of Rights Aotearoa. I appear before you today to deliver what I hope
will be the most important testimony you hear on this Bill. I contend I am uniquely qualified
to comment on this proposed legislation because I am both a human rights professional
and the holder of a Master’s degree in business strategy, organisational science, and
leadership from LBS - London Business School. This proposed legislation engages issues
at the intersection of human rights and organisational strategy.
2. I am very proud of having been accepted into LBS, it was an extremely competitive entry
process and completing the full-time taught degree onsite in London for a year was one of
the most intense work periods of my life. I attended intimate talks from dozens of leaders
and a few sports coaches – two I remember vividly were Paul McGinley – the European
Ryder Cup captain and Eddie Jones on how to build high-performing teams.
3. But now I sit before you, back in Aotearoa, a kiwi commenting on a proposed Bill which — in
my opinion — represents one of the most catastrophically evidence-defying pieces of
legislation ever proposed in New Zealand's history. I do not make this statement lightly. I
make it based on decades of world-leading organisational research that this Bill
completely ignores.
So let’s crack into it.
4. The first and overarching reason that we should reject the Diversity, equity and
inclusions (DEI)-destroying provisions of this bill is that they are based on an entirely
false Premise.
5. The Bill's proponents claim diversity undermines merit. This is demonstrably, empirically,
categorically false. I will now present extremely strong evidence from London Business
School - one of the world's premier business research institutions - that demonstrates the
exact opposite.
6. Professor Herminia Ibarra's Research: The Architecture of Exclusion: Professor Herminia organisations don't achieve merit-based selection. They achieve homogeneity through
unconscious exclusion. Old white men exclude minorities unconsciously through patterns
of behaviour.
7. Consider her findings:
• Senior leaders unconsciously sponsor protégés who remind them of
themselves
• Women receive 75% fewer high-visibility assignments critical for
advancement
• Performance criteria systematically favour stereotypically masculine traits
• Without structured DEI interventions, informal networks exclude diverse
talent
This isn't ideology. This is peer-reviewed, longitudinal research across thousands of
organisations.
8. Ibarra's concept of the "authenticity paradox" is particularly damning for this Bill. When
marginalised people are told to "just be yourself" in workplaces designed for others, they
face an impossible choice: conform and lose their identity, or remain authentic and be
excluded. DEI frameworks resolve this paradox by broadening what leadership looks like.
9. Removing these frameworks doesn't enhance merit - it restores the old boys' network.
We end up with a public sector that looks like the Vienna Philharmonic – not the New
York Phil. (Famously, the New York-based orchestra much more closely resembles the
output of global and American music schools, whilst the Vienna-based orchestra looks
more like our PM.)
10. Professor Ioannis Ioannou's Research: The Performance Imperative: Now let me present
Professor Ioannou's groundbreaking research on organisational performance. His 18-year
longitudinal study, published in Management Science, tracked companies that adopted
comprehensive ESG principles - of which DEI is a critical component.
11. The results:
• High Sustainability companies showed 4.8% higher annual returns
• Superior return on assets and equity
• Better operational efficiency
• Greater resilience during economic downturns
Let me be crystal clear: organisations with strong DEI frameworks financially
outperform those without them. This isn't correlation. Ioannou's research establishes causation through sophisticated
econometric analysis. Companies in the top quartile for diversity show 36% higher
profitability. While public service doesn't measure profit, equivalent gains in efficiency and
effectiveness would transform government performance.
13. The Bill's proposal to eliminate DEI is equivalent to a high-performing company suddenly
abandoning its winning strategy. In the private sector, this would be considered managerial
malpractice. Directors would be sued for breach of fiduciary duty.
--------- (keep 14 and 15 unread and in reserve)
14. ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE (Can refer to in questions)The McKinsey Evidence: McKinsey's
2023 "Diversity Matters Even More" report analysed 1,265 companies across 23 countries.
Companies with gender-diverse executive teams were 39% more likely to outperform. For
ethnic diversity, it's 36%. The penalty for homogeneity is growing every year.
15. The Harvard Business Review Meta-Analysis: Thirty years of leadership research
confirms:
• Diverse teams make better decisions 87% of the time
• Inclusive cultures show 39% lower turnover
• 22% higher productivity
• 17% better team performance
This is not one study. This is the convergence of thousands of studies across millions of
data points.
------------
16. International Disasters We're About to Repeat: Committee members, we have real-time
evidence of what happens when governments eliminate DEI:
a. United States Federal Government, 2025:
• 23% resignation rate among employees of colour within three
months
• 78% of terminated DEI positions were women of colour
• Service delivery failures spiked 34%
• Constitutional crises and ongoing litigation
These aren't projections. This is happening right now. And you want to import this kind of
disaster to New Zealand?
17. The New Zealand Context: This Bill would:
• Breach our Te Tiriti obligations requiring active protection of Māori interests Violate international human rights treaties we've ratified, including CEDAW and
ICCPR
• Potentially trigger mass resignations costing hundreds of millions
• Create legal chaos and years of litigation
• Destroy public service capability for a generation
(The only government department in favour of this bill will be Crown Law, as they will be in
demand managing legal actions against it).
18. I would conservatively estimate the economic cost of this bill to be over 4 billion over the
first 5 years of implementation. That's billion with a B. How did I get this number? After
subtracting direct transfers (like welfare/superann) and costs of debt financing, the total
public sector OPEX spend is about 89 billion NZD a year. So imagine we lose just 2 per cent
of productivity and efficiency on that number, and we have 3 per cent more staff turnover.
19. (Extra detail for questions) That includes actual costs, and lost productivity, employee
turnover, and efficiency losses and performance and organisational effectiveness hits.
That's $250-500 million annually in turnover costs, $500 million in productivity losses, plus
litigation and service delivery failures.
20. As well as being qualified in business, I am a human rights professional and in terms of
human rights, I tautoko the Human Rights Commission’s excellent written and oral
submissions. This bill is both an organisational disaster area and a human rights nightmare. I
am focussing on the organisational aspects for time reasons.
21. So to bring this all together – in conclusion: Honourable Committee members, we need to
acknowledge the Truth About Merit—true meritocracy cannot exist without mechanisms
to identify and eliminate bias. When you remove DEI frameworks, you don't get merit-based
selection. You get what Professor Ibarra calls "homophily" - people hiring people like
themselves.
22. The false choice between merit and diversity is a con. Excellence requires inclusion. Merit
demands diversity.
pault.bsky.social
Wish me luck, team - I am appearing in front of the Governance and Administration Committee tomorrow at 8am to make my oral submission against the Public Service Amendment Bill.

Once again, it is a bill not grounded in evidence. DEI is crucial for avoiding bias in organisations.
Governance and Administration Subcommittee A

8.00am

-

1.45pm

Room 5, Parliament House

Public Service Amendment Bill

8.00am

-

9.00am

Rights Aotearoa

8.00am

-

8.10am

Paul Thistoll, CEO

 

 

 

 

Trust Democracy

8.10am

-

8.20am

 

Simon Right, Chair

 

 

 

 

Professor Jonathan Boston

8.20am

-

8.25am

 

Interested Citizens Group - Hamilton

8.25am

-

8.35am
pault.bsky.social
Oh sorry! I normally put alt text but I was on my phone
pault.bsky.social
Completely agree with you, Catherine. Let's show a united front.
Reposted by Paul Thistoll
catherinejmckenzie.bsky.social
Can not stress enough how important it is for all supporters of the three opposition parties to work together in a unified way to push the C.o.C. out in 2026. Less fighting, more kotahitanga.
mountaintui.bsky.social
#nzpol Video from 3 month ago: "Labour will repeal Regulatory Standards Bill within 100 days" @duncanwebbmp.bsky.social confirms again today
pault.bsky.social
Reading Rawls' "A Theory of Justice" was a seminal moment for me.

I feel like Luxon would use it to put under a wonky table.
Reposted by Paul Thistoll
duncanwebbmp.bsky.social
The select committee report on the Regulatory Standards Bill is in.
📝166,000 submissions.
❌98.7% opposed.
Yet National are going to continue supporting it.
🗣New Zealand could not have been louder, but Luxon still isn’t listening.
Regulatory Standards Bill:
Select Committee Report:
166,000 submission total
0.7% supported
0.6% unclear
98.7% opposed

AUTHORISED BY DUNCAN WEBB MP, PARLIAMENT BUILDINGS WELLINGTON
pault.bsky.social
The next time someone says the Atlas Network is just a figment of our left wing paranoid imagination show them this X post:
pault.bsky.social
Excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
duncanwebbmp.bsky.social
We will repeal it in the first 100 days.
pault.bsky.social
lol. Love your sense of humour
pault.bsky.social
I feel like the Spinoff needs to do something on this mythical Rolex - find out which one it was, and how bejewelled it was.
pault.bsky.social
Can someone pop into Patridges and see what Rolex models around 90k they suddenly have back in stock? I want to see what kind of taste Ray Chung has!

😅😜😆😜
pault.bsky.social
A SEGM conference is not a scientific conference unless you think science should completely disregard human rights.

And Psychology is one area of science that is essentially intermingled with human rights.
The president of the German Medical Association, Klaus Reinhardt, has condemned the “public defamation of participants in a scientific conference”. 

He was referring to online “Know your enemy posters” showing photos of presenters at the recent meeting of the Society for Evidence-based Gender Medicine held in a secret, secure location in Berlin as trans activists sought to locate and disrupt the event. 

“Such methods cross every line of objective debate and promote intimidation and, in some cases, even actual real threats,” Dr Reinhardt told the newspaper Die Welt. “We must be seriously concerned about scientific freedom in our country as well.”

More at the link below.
Reposted by Paul Thistoll
pault.bsky.social
98.7% of approximately 166,300 public submissions opposed the RSB

But the majority of the committee has recommended it go forward with only really cosmetic changes.
Committee process
The Regulatory Standards Bill was referred to this committee on 22 May 2025. We
called for submissions on the bill with a closing date of 23 June 2025. About 166,300
submissions were lodged through the website and by email.1
A minority of us would like to report that the Ministry for Regulation contracted
Allen + Clarke to assist with analysing submissions. Of the submissions analysed,
98.7 percent opposed the bill, 0.7 percent were in support, and 0.6 percent were either
unclear or did not take a position on the bill.
A majority would like to report that from additional analysis, 1,317 submissions were
identified as containing detail or unique arguments, and were considered to be 'substantive' on this basis.
pault.bsky.social
That's a very good idea about Emergency! :-)
pault.bsky.social
Very good point BikerChiwi.
pault.bsky.social
Yes, some of them are very gaudy.

Just for disclosure too - if I could afford a watch like that, then I would get a Cartier Ballon Blue, which is quite tasteful.

www.jomashop.com/cartier-ball...
Cartier Ballon Bleu Automatic Blue Dial Men's Watch wsbb0027
Shop for Ballon Bleu Automatic Blue Dial Men's Watch wsbb0027 by Cartier at JOMASHOP.
www.jomashop.com
pault.bsky.social
Lola is a watch person - she reads watch blogs and we discuss the finer points of Tourbillon mechanisms - so I understand why people are into them.
Funnily enough, I have been to the Swiss town of Biel, which is where Rolex make all its mechanical movements are produced and assembled.
pault.bsky.social
If you want to lead—whether its being PM, delivering a $10B dollar transformation project, conducting the local choir, or leading a non-profit—there is one overarching skill you need: you must bring the people you are leading along the journey with you.
Luxon just doesn't have the skills to do this.