Ontario Traffic Man
@ontariotrafficman.bsky.social
410 followers 37 following 1.3K posts
Transportation in Ontario. EN🇨🇦/FR🇨🇦/NL🇳🇱 He/him youtube.com/@ontariotrafficman
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Metrolinx says they're acquiring land from CN which implies the southern pair of tracks will be dedicated to GO
It says 4 trips, which is 2 round trips. Metrolinx loves announcing the one-way trip numbers because people will misinterpret them as twice as much service as actually planned.

Same thing happened a few weeks ago when they announced 13 trips to Confederation station. It's only 6.5 round trips.
A big part of the issue is poor forward visibility in SUVs, which seems to be a fashion choice.

Real trucks don't need high hoods:
A cab-over FedEx truck in downtown Ottawa
Yield to oncoming traffic situations are remarkably common on older residential streets with on-street parking. There is no sign required.

Even the loopy streets in my parents' 1980's suburb are narrow enough that you can't pass oncoming traffic at parked cars
Fixing the line to Gaspésie makes sense if it's $80M, or maybe if it's $800M and significantly faster than the bus. But spending $800M on a line that's still slower than the bus makes no sense
People often complain that I only talk about Canada and the Netherlands in my videos. But those are the only two countries where I have lived and worked, so they're the only countries where I can give such in-depth explanations.
Idiotic comments Idiotic comments
Transforming from a flawed democracy to an unashamed dictatorship is still a transformation
They're not called PXOs in Alberta (that's an Ontario term) but yeah it's a signed unsignalized crosswalk
Mobility access is equally good on double deckers and dwell times are not very important on an inter-community route
More like "Automatique pour le peuple"
That's an En dash (–) not an Em dash (—)
Someone keeps reporting my street as 'closed' to Google Maps. It's not closed, I their they're just trying to reduce the traffic on their street
I discovered they exist when a LACMTA ticket vending machine gave me 18 of them as change for a $20 bill
My challenge every week is to find somewhere to drive to. I try to drive my car at least once every two weeks to keep the 12V battery topped up.

Nearly all of my trips are more convenient by bicycle
The Pickering-Oshawa segment already has a yard, no need to push the train anywhere. I assume GO's electric trains would have a small battery to let them move around the yard off-wire anyway. Even in the long term it's probably not worth electrifying the yard leads.
Yes you want a simple test bed but Lakeshore East already has that between Pickering and Oshawa.
That's not really an issue because we want different service types anyway. We can have bi-mode express trains to Hamilton/Niagara in addition to frequent local EMUs to Burlington

The portion of the line where both services overlap is the part they already own.
I suspect the most cost-effective solution in the long run would be to build in-house expertise and run a steady, predictable electrification program that adds xx km of line every year.
It is insane how often people tell me that GO Expansion is hindered by freight trains.

In reality GO already owns all of the tracks where frequent service is proposed, except for a few hundred metres at Bramalea station. And there is almost no freight traffic in those lines.
Reposted by Ontario Traffic Man
This "priority removal section" for the bike lane on Bloor W demonstrates that Ford and Sarkaria were never serious about finding parallel secondary routes. Where is the parallel route here? They don't care. www.thestar.com/news/gta/the...
A map of part of the Bloor West bike lane showing that a section beween Islington and Resurrection Rd was prioritized for removal. Nearby streets curve off in various directions, avoiding railway tracks and providing no straightforward alternative.
The station is obviously designed for far more than 6 trains per day. The problem is that the track speed limit between West Harbour is only 48 km/h, so the existing Route 11 and 12 bus services are faster to Hamilton and the GTA, respectively. So there's not currently any demand for train service
Signal priority is already in place. The question you need to ask is: "Is the signal priority any good?"

(I'm pretty confident the answer is No)
30 minute service to Niagara would be politically challenging due to the impacts on the Welland Canal. Hourly service seems plausible though, since the canal bridge is double-tracked so trains can be timed to cross simultaneously in both directions.
When Metrolinx say 13 trips, that means 6 to 7 trips per direction. They always cherry pick statistics to sound more impressive than they actually are