Scientists nowadays tend to specify whether they are talking about rayfinned, lobefinned or cartilaginous fish which do form valid phylogenies (or get group all boned fish into the group Osteichthyes)
The fact that hereditarians are arguing for a smaller & smaller h² to "vindicate" them & Charles Murray is still going on about "5 more yrs" Shows that they lost
The altantic, the exact type of organization most likely to well come this champagne racism this yr had two articles refute this psuedoscientific garbage
Have they? The US right is religious motivated & antiscience & the left is broadly against all of Hanania's ideas, aside from some centrist elites who considers his ideas agreeable & worthwhile?
That doesn't have to be the case & I don't think it will be, there's already a backlash against cowardly appeasement centrism that can magnify to include racists shitheads like Hanania (who supported the trump regime until recently)
They're two problems with this is: If u extend grace to people who believe this there's a chance they'll get comfortable/confident enough to demand legal act & even if they don't they can still discriminate using non legal mechanicisms & looopholes
That's not what you said at all, but that aside I don't think doing a pilot study to test out a public option for a service is a "different kind of politics" let alone one comparable to Trump's
Since you agree with the fact that immigrants aren't more dangerous what do you want dems to do other than point that fact out? What more is there to say than "That's not true here's the prove" ?
I have no strong feelings either way but I don't think that the people with the "get off this site loser" mentality care whether or not people leave twitter or if this site's user base grows, in fact alot of them want it to be smaller
