Nina says Free Link!
@ninamelechen.bsky.social
1.3K followers 950 following 8.7K posts
Nashvillian, Jwitter refugee (1n1m1), retired, loves medieval history & roots music & food & books, she/her, Boomer white/cis/straight trying to help
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
As a response to the far too numerous recent references On Here to "moneylenders in the Temple" (usually meaning Trump), here's a thread about why that phrasing is not merely incorrect, but a carryover from medieval Christian antisemitism & actively harmful to Jews today. 1/
We could benefit from it a great deal. So it’s kind of important to keep it in mind not to gratuitously insult any part of that coalition.
Oh, that’s not at all what I think is going on there. Jesus used parables to shock, and replacing Cohen/Levi/Yisrael with Cohen/Levi/Samaritan would have been shocking. And gotten people to consider whether Samaritans could be neighbors as well as enemies. That’s not supercessionism.
Unless you’re trying to keep Jews out of your alliance, maybe you could avoid suggesting that Jewish scriptures are somehow bad? bsky.app/profile/emil...
🧵I'm listening to a book by someone whose work I respect & as sometimes happens, was hit by ignorant & frankly antisemitic language around Jewish scripture & "the Old Testament God" that, whenever I hear it, I feel like my head's going to blow off.

So. A thread! Fun!
Okay, I thought I knew what you meant, but now I’m not sure. In what sense are you using “replace”?
That’s the whole point of the story, I think.
I’m sure it’s accidental, but you’re repeating a mistake that people make a lot that actually stems from medieval antisemitism. It’s the sort of thing that, if you don’t want to drive Jews away, you ought to avoid.

bsky.app/profile/nina...
As a response to the far too numerous recent references On Here to "moneylenders in the Temple" (usually meaning Trump), here's a thread about why that phrasing is not merely incorrect, but a carryover from medieval Christian antisemitism & actively harmful to Jews today. 1/
You just can’t get started prepping your Seder too early.
Well, I’ve already agreed that Talmud isn’t central to the synagogue service. But the reason that the Shema is central is explained in the Talmud. And if you want to know what times to say it, you have to look at Talmud because Torah (and the rest of Tanakh) won’t tell you. Talmud explains Torah.
If you’re an atheist why are you accepting Christian slanders as accurate?
LOL. It’s like the Highlander: there can only be one.
I think they see ICE as their competition. Of course they’re going to be cool with protests aimed in that general direction.
Not central to services, but central to life. And actually, worship services as we know them today were first defined in the Talmud.
The Talmud is central to all of Judaism except for Karaites, Reform, and Beta Israel. I mean, this person is utterly ignorant, but he’s right about that.
Christianity isn’t very different at all. It’s just that ideas about the imminent end of the world hadn’t changed, a consistent christology hadn’t developed, principles of belief hadn’t been systematized, organization hadn’t been developed, sacraments hadn’t been invented, and a lot more.
It’s a Grishaverse book. I enjoyed w.
The opinion/editorial side of the WSJ is still completely separated from the news side. You can (as of today) count on their reporting to be factual. This may get changed from above, but it hasn’t been yet.
Big issues! Religious and political ones! We think they’re dangerous and they think we are.
See, you have made up a new racial category. If you were thinking strictly about skin color, you’d group the child in with whichever racial group already had the same skin tone. Race is in our heads, not in any biological criteria.

You sound like you want to learn. Please read some books.
the context of the parable, would be an Evangelical Protestant living among Catholics. 2/2
You are accidentally using Christian categories to talk about what you presume Jews thought. For Christians, a non-Christian is a ‘pagan’. For Jews, a ‘pagan’ is a polytheist. Samaritans are monotheists, so no Jew categorizes them as ‘pagan’. (They also weren’t foreigners.) A better analogy, in 1/2
One reason it’s problematic is that the common mistake of thinking‘moneylenders’ instead of ‘moneychangers’ is the result of centuries of antisemitism: bsky.app/profile/nina...
As a response to the far too numerous recent references On Here to "moneylenders in the Temple" (usually meaning Trump), here's a thread about why that phrasing is not merely incorrect, but a carryover from medieval Christian antisemitism & actively harmful to Jews today. 1/
There’s no point to berating Jews because Christians don’t do what you want.
Then maybe you ought to be aware that there are ways of reacting to the Bible that are different from fundamentalist acceptance or ex-believer rejection. (Honestly, even most Christians don’t read it either of those ways.)