Jim Lauder
@mrjlauder.bsky.social
1.4K followers 1.7K following 1.7K posts
Dixons Academies. Schools as civic institutions - ensuring our communities have a voice and power. Building place based partnerships. Views my own. At weekends I post about cooking.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mrjlauder.bsky.social
More broadly, judging a school as a school-in-isolation is an inherently limiting thing to do.

It is easy to buy whatever narrative is being sold.

We need to also look at a school's role in its community and local school system, and longer term outcomes.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
The new framework is toothless on inclusion without looking at intake and mobility.

Just tokenistic window dressing.
jonnyuttley.bsky.social
They can still leave the legal implementation of admissions policy with Adjudicator but still look at impact, who attends the school, who leaves and why. Not doing so is a choice
Reposted by Jim Lauder
joel120193.bsky.social
Heads of Department/SLT

What do you do for pupils who have missed lessons due to being absent?

Do you give extra work, catch up work, direct them somewhere etc? What does it look like?

Would appreciate RTs for a wider range 👍
Reposted by Jim Lauder
jonnyuttley.bsky.social
They can still leave the legal implementation of admissions policy with Adjudicator but still look at impact, who attends the school, who leaves and why. Not doing so is a choice
Reposted by Jim Lauder
yuanfenyang.bsky.social
The best part about supermarket surgeries has got to be using the tannoy system – as well as all the surprising and fun conversations! Thanks to everyone who popped by to say hello in Morrison’s last week!
Reposted by Jim Lauder
helenaclare.bsky.social
Hello. If you haven't met me yet, I'm Helen and I help schools support their staff through perimenopause and menopause so that they can keep on doing their jobs to the best of their considerable ability.

I do this through talks, workshops, training, menopause mentoring and policy support.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
In personal news, I correctly called the twist in the latest episode of Grey's Anatomy. Torn between pride and shame.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
I think this is right, but I was also impressed by the volume of housing industry/FE sector crossover events at Labour conference, which suggested some people at least are making a concerted effort.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Agree - perhaps better (ha) to think in terms of trade-offs. X intervention/approach is really good for Y but comes at the cost of Z.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Yes, but it hasn't really worked out like that as @learnwhatyoulive.bsky.social points out
Reposted by Jim Lauder
learnwhatyoulive.bsky.social
Personal budgets are an option within EOTAS. Often v hard to obtain though. There is quite a variation in how this area is used currently (and it all sits outside the school system) which might be worth investigating for themes.
Reposted by Jim Lauder
learnwhatyoulive.bsky.social
ie - if parents make 90% good decisions and the system makes 80% good decisions (assuming we could all agree on ‘good’ which I very much doubt) then while we still need a consideration for the 10%, it would be an improvement. It is v hard to argue that the current system makes 100% good decisions.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Yeah that's a fair point
mrjlauder.bsky.social
RCTs involving unrestricted cash transfers aren't unprecedented (there have been quite a few), and the state does unrestricted cash transfers all the time.

Whisper it, but I think I saw some people spending their pension money on beer in Spoons (cannot wait until that is me).
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Yes, it's basically finding out if we'd get better outcomes by reducing EHCP funding and increasing DLA
mrjlauder.bsky.social
The point the opposite - let people do what they want as a trial and see if that's better or worse than the status quo, and in what ways.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Yes - it's not necessarily a good idea in and of itself, but trialling it would tell us a lot about what works and doesn't in the current system.
Reposted by Jim Lauder
danpaskins.bsky.social
Strongly support this idea from @mrjlauder.bsky.social. "Is spending money on a particular service better than a cash transfer" is a good way of learning how to improve services and reduce inequalities
mrjlauder.bsky.social
EEF RCT proposal: give EHCP money as a direct cash transfer to families.

Reckon there's a good chance that would lead to better outcomes.

Worth finding out - this would tell us a lot about a lot.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
There's lots of evidence cash transfers improve a variety of outcomes, and lots of evidence that current SEND provision is poor. So my question is, what provision in what circumstances is better or worse than just giving people the money?

That's worth knowing.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
It might be a disaster! But I think it would be illuminating to find out in a trial.

Families could use the money to fund provision in school, or for tuition/support outside school, or keep it and work less to support their child more.
Reposted by Jim Lauder
mrjlauder.bsky.social
EEF RCT proposal: give EHCP money as a direct cash transfer to families.

Reckon there's a good chance that would lead to better outcomes.

Worth finding out - this would tell us a lot about a lot.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
EEF RCT proposal: give EHCP money as a direct cash transfer to families.

Reckon there's a good chance that would lead to better outcomes.

Worth finding out - this would tell us a lot about a lot.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
Senior leaders spend a lot of time on the phone to families, but also to other professionals from different services. As with anything, it's important to practise so these calls can be as successful as possible.
mrjlauder.bsky.social
The phone - practising phone calls is essential for new senior leaders (or anyone in education)