Matt Berryman
banner
matt.berryman.social
Matt Berryman
@matt.berryman.social
9 followers 49 following 37 posts
Payments guy turned writer. Dad x3. Likes CrossFit, bikes & coffee. Writes about trust, tech, and the cost of friction at @txnintel.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Matt Berryman
We laugh about it now but that night took five years off my life. God love the medical staff of Cyprus
This matters for AI regulation. The EU's prescriptive approach (defining what AI must be) risks the same trap. The US prohibition model (defining what AI mustn't do) maintains adaptability.
In digital markets, second-order thinking isn't optional — it's survival.
Now UK users route their data through opaque overseas VPN providers. Remember Facebook's Onavo? That "privacy" VPN that secretly monitored competitors for acquisition targets?
That's who people trust with their browsing now.
When seat-belt laws came in (1983), compliance hit 90% within days. The London Congestion Charge (2003) cut traffic 15% in month one.
These worked because compliance became easier than resistance.
Age-verification did the opposite. It taught millions to vanish online.
Politicians celebrated when UK traffic to adult sites halved after mandatory age-verification launched in July 2025. Plot twist: VPN sign-ups surged 2,000% in 72 hours.

The UK government had just run the country's most successful VPN marketing campaign. 🧵
Anthropic have released a series of twelve lessons to improve your AI Fluency; www.anthropic.com/ai-fluency

Based upon The AI Fluency Framework by Dakan & Feller, it's designed to help improve how people work with AI to get the best quality of outcomes. Well worth 3-4h of you time.
AI Fluency: Frameworks and Foundations
Anthropic AI Fluency course and education
www.anthropic.com
Reposted by Matt Berryman
What does my phone think happened to me four years ago?
Wait… you can hear me right?
Sustainable AI can’t be an afterthought. #GreenAI #ResponsibleAI
6/ 📊 As the race for ever-larger models continues, it’s time we ask:

Can we innovate efficiently; not just intelligently?
5/ 🔍 Why it matters:

Most AI labs don’t disclose this info. Mistral’s transparency sets a precedent but also makes the case for environmental reporting standards in AI.
4/ 🪨 Material Footprint

Training also used 660 kg antimony equivalent—a proxy for electronic waste and heavy metal impact.

That’s a weighty externality for digital progress.
3/💧 Water Usage

It consumed 281,000 m³ of water—that’s enough to supply ~3,700 people for a full year.

Data centres and model training are thirsty.
2/ 📦 CO₂ Emissions

Training Large 2 generated 20,400 tonnes of CO₂e—roughly equivalent to the annual emissions of 4,300+ petrol cars.

[Ref: mistral.ai/news/mistra...]
1/ French AI startup Mistral just dropped the most detailed environmental report we’ve seen on a large language model to date.

Their “Large 2” model came with a serious carbon, water, and resource cost. 🧵 #AI #Sustainability #LLMs
Reposted by Matt Berryman
Amazing name of the day.
11/
For every board member and risk professional: The most dangerous phrase in any boardroom isn't "I don't know"—it's "I thought I knew."

Time to ask: What critical reports are sitting in someone's inbox right now, deemed too uncomfortable to escalate?
10/
The lesson? In complex organisations, having three lines of defence means nothing if they don't talk to each other.

Having escalation policies means nothing if the culture punishes bad news.

Having a Board means nothing if they only see what people want them to see.
9/
This comes ONE DAY after Monzo's £21m fine where Buckingham Palace was used as a registered address.

Two days. Two fines. £33 million. Same pattern:

Critical information that never reached the boardroom.
8/
The root causes per Bank of England:
- Insufficiently integrated risk management framework
- Risk decisions made without involving Risk Function
- Failed escalation to senior committees
- Governance "below standards expected"

Fine reduced from £20m for cooperation.
7/
The Board's reaction when they finally saw the hidden reports in June 2022?

They admitted they "would NOT have signed" the compliance confirmation had they known.

This wasn't deception. It was systemic information failure.
6/
When the Bank appointed an independent expert to verify compliance, the truth emerged.

May 2022 finding: Vocalink had FAILED to comply due to "unrealistic scope, timeline and Executive overcommitment."

Then the buried reports surfaced...
5/
Yet on 28 Feb 2022, Vocalink wrote to the Bank of England confirming FULL COMPLIANCE with the regulatory direction.

The Board had signed off based on incomplete information.

The three lines of defence had failed. Catastrophically.
4/
The reports never reached:
❌ The Risk Committee
❌ The Board
❌ Internal Audit
❌ The executives signing off compliance

One staff member's reaction when seeing them: "[This] makes it look like [the programme] didn't deliver..."