Kathryn Tewson
@kathryntewson.bsky.social
36K followers 2.5K following 31K posts
Good in a crisis and at no other time First initial last name at gmail dot com Signal:@KathrynTewson.06
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kathryntewson.bsky.social
New policy: people who come into my mentions to scold me for how I engage with bad-faith users are getting blocked. Y’all clearly are looking for a different online experience than the one I provide, so I’ll just help you along to it.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
I’m not sure what the point you’re making is. If it’s “the scene from the godfather probably didn’t happen,” then i am quite happy to concede that the movie was fiction.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Who claimed that, and where?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
What do you mean by “taking credit for”?

Is it cultural theft to speak a different language?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
It is true, however, that the names as delivered on the shipping manifest were officially recorded at Ellis Island.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
oh well if someone on Twitter who did genealogy said so, then I guess we can ignore the national archives
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Does everyone who moves to another country, learns the language, and likes the food commit cultural theft?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
How does that follow? Are Arab-Americans who eat pizza thieves of culture?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Where's the dividing line between assimilation and cultural theft?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
That's an application for citizenship, not a verification of entry.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
It seems like you have taken a highly defensible claim that any name changes to immigrants were not typically the result of intentional acts or negligence on the part of individuals working at Ellis Island specifically, and broadened it out beyond reckoning.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Someone's name, hypothetically, is 李美平. How would it have been recorded on the shipping manifest, do you think? How about Глафира Васильевич, or Αρτέμης Παττακός, or 권해옥?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Yeah. The shipping manifests were required by law to be filled out in English, which presents a bit of a difficulty when the name is in a non-Roman alphabet (or not in an alphabet at all).
kathryntewson.bsky.social
Their status as someone whose entry into the country had occurred after inspection and recording.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
So you're no longer arguing that the shipping manifests were unofficial documents of no import whatsoever?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
So what happens if you stick by your name as you know it, and then your immigration status needs to be verified and your name doesn't appear on the shipping manifest?
kathryntewson.bsky.social
www.hollander-waas.com/blog/ellis-i...

This article also confirms that many peoples' names changed during the immigration process.
Sometimes, this name change happened before even boarding the ship to America; if one had a brother, husband, or uncle in America who had already gone from Rabinowitz to Robins (as David Rabinowitz of New York did in 1921), the immigrant would often adopt this new, shortened name before even boarding the ship. This is why you often see a husband immigrate under one surname, and his wife arrive a year later with their children under the new, shortened name.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-...

This article confirms that name changes could happen, even if they arose from errors overseas.
 Name changes “could happen, but they are not as likely as people have been led to believe,” he says.

Ellis Island inspectors were not responsible for recording immigrants’ names. Instead, any error likely happened overseas.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
journals.ala.org/index.php/dt... This article confirms that the shipping manifests were official immigration documents, required by law at the port of entry, and that the captain was subject to heavy fines and penalties if he didn't provide one.
Beginning on that date (i.e., when the federal government assumed control over immigration), ship captains were required to report a list of all passengers brought to US shores from foreign countries; information required included name, sex, age, and occupation.6 Several decades later, in 1893 (just after Ellis Island opened), the requirements for manifests became even more specific: the shipping company clerks were required to obtain contact information and to ask each passenger a series of questions about their health and political views. Furthermore, the clerks who created the manifests were told that “immigrants shall be listed in convenient groups . . . and no [list] shall contain more than 30 names.”7 These instructions are precise and clear, and they are not mere suggestions—they are published in the U.S. Statutes at Large, which contain federal laws as they are passed by Congress. Any captain who didn’t turn over a list of names when he dropped off his passengers faced a displeased federal official and some steep fines.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
I'll happily accept the answer of "The misrecording of names happened somewhere else, and by some other person, than at Ellis Island." But the idea that nobody's name was ever altered in practical effect by the immigration process is bonkers.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
You literally said the shipping manifest was "not an official document." bsky.app/profile/roby...
robynelyse.bsky.social
They looked at the shipping manifest. Which was not an official document, so if they spelled her name "Katherine," it would not have mattered IN THE SLIGHTEST and she could go back to spelling it "Kathryn" the next day, possibly without even knowing how it was spelled on the manifest.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
But if they didn't, and they needed their immigration status verified, they could have been in for a spot of bother.
kathryntewson.bsky.social
For starters, when you claimed that a document with "Required by the regulations of the Secretary of Commerce and Labor of the United States under Act of Congress" written across the top was not an official document.