Gualtiero Piccinini
@gualtiero.bsky.social
1.1K followers 360 following 270 posts
Florence G. Kline Prof & Curators’ Distinguished Prof @ MU. Barwise Prize winner. Author, Neurocognitive Mechanisms (OUP 2020). Resist fascism, address climate change, support Ukraine!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gualtiero.bsky.social
So, I will try to put together a monograph and turn this paper into at least two of its chapters. The monograph is tentatively entitled Neurocognitive Architecture: Foundations for a Unified Theory of Mind and is under contract with Springer for their Synthese Library.
9/
gualtiero.bsky.social
The paper is 25,000 words, too long for a journal article and yet rather compressed. Several aspects deserve to be addressed in more detail. It would also benefit from being placed in a broader context.
8/
gualtiero.bsky.social
As always, further feedback is welcome, especially in light of the following.
7/
gualtiero.bsky.social
The paper defends the Nonclassical LOT thesis that some neural representations represent in a (natural) language-like way, yet they encode information nondigitally and are processed by ordinary (Nonclassical) neural computations that rely not only on syntactic structure but other features.
6/
gualtiero.bsky.social
(3) It discusses the degree to which different LOT hypotheses are supported or undermined by neuroscientific evidence about computational architecture and concludes that Classical LOT is ruled out while a version of Nonclassical LOT is plausible.
5/
gualtiero.bsky.social
2) It rebuts some popular arguments for Classical (Fodorian) LOT, including the argument that neuroscientific evidence is merely relevant to how computations are implemented.
4/
gualtiero.bsky.social
The paper advances the debate in three ways: (1) It distinguishes different LOT hypotheses—including Representational, Computational, Classical, and Nonclassical LOT hypotheses—in terms of the computational architecture they require. This clarifies LOT's empirical commitments.
3/
gualtiero.bsky.social
The main argument is the same but I've made a few tweaks and added some footnotes. I have now posted it on the ArXiv (link in comments) and a couple of other places so it can be cited in a stable form.
2/
gualtiero.bsky.social
A paper on mine entitled "Neural Hardware for the Language of Thought: New Rules for an Old Game" has been circulating since early 2025 and has been cited in print. I have received anonymous feedback from some Classical LOT supporters and made some revisions to address their concerns.
1/
gualtiero.bsky.social
👇
marielgoddu.bsky.social
Our chapter on cognitive homologies *in print* ! 🤩
@beakr.bsky.social @gualtiero.bsky.social
Thread & link 🔗 below👇
gualtiero.bsky.social
I don't think you need to go to a lower leve: bsky.app/profile/gual...
gualtiero.bsky.social
My commentary on Anil Seth's forthcoming BBS target article defending biological naturalism has been accepted. It's entitled "The Neurobiophysical Substrate of Consciousness":
1/
Academia.edu - Find Research Papers, Topics, Researchers
Academia.edu is the platform to share, find, and explore 50 Million research papers. Join us to accelerate your research needs & academic interests.
Academia.edu
gualtiero.bsky.social
Therefore, computational functionalism fails and one of the following holds: biological naturalism, a nonbiological yet noncomputational version of functionalism, or a view according to which consciousness requires specific (macro)physical qualities.
3/
Academia.edu - Find Research Papers, Topics, Researchers
Academia.edu is the platform to share, find, and explore 50 Million research papers. Join us to accelerate your research needs & academic interests.
Academia.edu
gualtiero.bsky.social
Abstract: I argue that creature consciousness depends on specific neurobiophysical properties that constitute the medium for phenomenally conscious states. Such properties are not medium flexible in the way required by computational functionalism.
2/
Academia.edu - Find Research Papers, Topics, Researchers
Academia.edu is the platform to share, find, and explore 50 Million research papers. Join us to accelerate your research needs & academic interests.
Academia.edu
gualtiero.bsky.social
My commentary on Anil Seth's forthcoming BBS target article defending biological naturalism has been accepted. It's entitled "The Neurobiophysical Substrate of Consciousness":
1/
Academia.edu - Find Research Papers, Topics, Researchers
Academia.edu is the platform to share, find, and explore 50 Million research papers. Join us to accelerate your research needs & academic interests.
Academia.edu
Reposted by Gualtiero Piccinini
alfredovernazzani.bsky.social
This book is finally out. You'll find there our chapter on "Frames of discovery and the format of cognitive representation" by yours truly and Dimitri Coelho Mollo.

Thanks to @gualtiero.bsky.social for the amazing editirial work!
gualtiero.bsky.social
Neurocognitive Foundations of Mind is out. Check it out.
gualtiero.bsky.social
Revealed: the huge growth of Myanmar scam centres that may hold 100,000 trafficked people - The Guardian
gualtiero.bsky.social
You’re barely getting started 🤣
gualtiero.bsky.social
The gist of the whole project is that levels of organization are interdependent. No to strong synchronic emergence (though yes to diachronic emergence), no to reduction or autonomy, yes to integration, multiscale modeling, multilevel mechanistic explanation.
gualtiero.bsky.social
Bob continued to publish in philosophy into his 80s. Everything I read by him is insightful, original, and worth reading and thinking about.

I learned a lot from Bob. I will always remember his warmth, kindness, and insight.
5/5