Felix Sargent
banner
fsargent.bsky.social
Felix Sargent
@fsargent.bsky.social
54 followers 16 following 22 posts
Former chair of the board at the Center for Election Science. Passionate advocate for election reform and systemic solutions to societies problems. London
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
STV is a form of PR. PR just means it’s proportional, and seats match votes.
Reposted by Felix Sargent
🚨 NEW: Cross-party MPs publish ‘ready to go’ blueprint for electoral reform commission

— FPTP “threatens to undermine the resilience and stability of our democratic system”, @appgfairelections.bsky.social MPs say
— The group is calling on ministers to greenlight its plan

Exclusive story 👇
Cross-party MPs publish ‘ready to go’ blueprint for electoral reform commission - Politics.co.uk
A group of cross-party MPs have set out a “ready to go” blueprint for an independent review of the UK’s first past the post (FPTP) electoral system. The all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for fair e...
www.politics.co.uk
Reposted by Felix Sargent
📜 We're pleased to publish a Terms of Reference for a National Commission on Electoral Reform

⚖️ This is a ready to go plan to independently review how Parliament is elected, promote a national conversation, and build consensus on a way forward

🧵 1/3
National Commission on Electoral Reform: Terms of Reference
APPG for Fair Elections
www.fairelections.uk
We have the first ever cast vote records from an approval voting election! ✅✅☑️✅
The St. Louis data is conclusive: voters embraced the system's flexibility. 33% approved multiple candidates, debunking bullet voting myths.
felixsargent.com/democracy/20...
St. Louis Approval Voting: What the Cast Vote Records Reveal
Analysis of cast vote records from St. Louis's approval voting election reveals that voters embraced the system as intended, with 33% supporting multiple can...
felixsargent.com
Reposted by Felix Sargent
I've no love for IRV, but STV is good enough.
> We would conclude by emphasising that our basic recommendation is that there should be electoral reform. Whatever arguments there maybe about the systems we have described, these should not be allowed to obscure our fundamental and unanimous decision.
Essential reading for the history of proportional representation and electoral reform in the UK
📊 The complete 1976 Hansard Society Commission on Electoral Reform is now on @archive.org

I've converted the PDF to markdown/epub with:
✅ Verified election data tables (1918-1974)
✅ Clean formatting and structure
✅ Full accessibility

@makevotesmatter.bsky.social
@electoralreform.bsky.social
Commission On Electoral Reform ( 1976) : The Hansard Society : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The Report Of The Hansard Society Commission On Electoral Reform
archive.org
Reposted by Felix Sargent
1.

I'm stunned to find myself writing this, but I can suddenly see a route to PR

It's partly the rise of Reform, of course, but partly about the Labour rule-book

NEW COL explains www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/707...
PR is no longer unthinkable
Turkeys don’t vote for Christmas, but if and when Labour members pick the next PM, electoral reform could become unavoidable
www.prospectmagazine.co.uk
I want a sticker set of all the emoji. Not some, all of them. Why is this hard?
I’m worried that RCV is an intentional wedge issue that stops voting reform. Alternative Vote (an RCV method) failed in the UK because of its complexity.

No matter how much we want proportional representation the UK, RCV will cause it to fail.

Our opponents are counting on it.
The electoral reform movement is hamstrung by so much of the good work being done behind closed doors, and not wanting to celebrate until we win the war.
We need to be loud about every meeting. Every letter to the editor.
RCV is a tax on the electoral reform movement.
Approval.vote is down while working with
@electionscience.bsky.social
to renew the domain, but in the meanwhile it’s available on approvalvoting.report
Approval.vote
Reposted by Felix Sargent
Honestly, this is so confusing. Makes me much prefer Approval Voting instead of ranked choice voting.
Densification is the solution, no?
Reposted by Felix Sargent
There are a lot of interesting details for scholars to explore about basically everything, but for practitioners you get the most value out of the basics:

— Moderates do better at elections
— Free trade makes most people better off
— The past was poorer
Reposted by Felix Sargent
Please consider approval voting instead. It's much simpler for voters, and also simpler to count.

It's vital that our country gets rid of first past the post, and RCV is too complex-seeming to get the popular support it needs.

Approval voting is an easy sell "vote for whoever you approve of"
Great info. Why would ranked choice be easier though? I find “pick all you like, most votes wins” answers all the questions.
Reposted by Felix Sargent