EnbyCharlie628
enbycharlie628.bsky.social
EnbyCharlie628
@enbycharlie628.bsky.social
19 followers 16 following 50 posts
They/it 🍉 🏳️‍⚧️ 🟡⚪️🟣⚫️
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
December Holiday energy fr
#deltarune
I can't make up my mind so I'm turning to screaming into an endless void and hoping someone will respond (peak Dess behaviour tbh)
Who and/or what is Ralsei referring to when he says "it" here? I've asked many people, gotten 4 responses, 3 of those being unique
Just as i was saying to people i was delaying drawing because i wanted to wait for stream
"Undertale fan attempts to read" this is not going to go well /j
Mike, that includes this post, but that doesn't matter since Shayy and their followers (Undertale fans) couldn't read it anyway and were just reacting to the happy froggit in the pfp /j
Wait if I am Undertale fan how did I read this post to reply? Eh I probably didn't since Undertale fans can't read
I have realised a week later I missed an r in Kris's last name
The whole point of my original post was the 'who it was' doesnt matter to the 'who it is now' in terms of its pronouns and its pronouns as The Knight should only be determined by the now state (knight) and not the before state (dess, etc) even, especially when the knights lore focuses on the before?
Implying dark candy is not an object??
My point is it didnt lie and it isnt wrong, i dont know what the point you're trying to make is?
You can argue that the knight may not use they and queen, king, susie, etc just guessed wrong. But it uses it in its battle flavour text, neither kris nor the narration would lie ab that. But regardless, it never uses he or she, the point i was making in the first place that i feel has been lost
As i said earlier, from a meta sense, the narration/flavour text would have no reason to lie about a character's pronouns. Character a not knowing character b's pronouns is one thing, but the narration is above the story, and while its limiting sometimes, it doesnt lie
The flavour text mostly just narrates whats happening to the player, using 3rd person for everyone except kris whos typically in 2nd (most the time, but not all). Whats happening is limited to kris's knowledge, but that 3rd person perspective and therefore pronouns are beyond what kris could imagine
Flavour text is all knowing in the pronoun department for every other character, including most enemies who otherwise are never referred to in the 3rd person. And in a meta sense, the game would have no reason to lie about what pronouns are used in the flavour text.
We know king, queen, jevil, and maybe more know of the knight's desires, so it very well might have spoken to any or all of these ppl
And, as ive said prior, the all knowing flavour text doesnt need the knight's voice to know its pronouns. Arguing the origin of the pronouns is meaningless with this
Elaboration on why social anxiety doesnt apply:
Frisk post asriel fight is more than happy to talk to everyone, let everyone know their name, theyve literally been on dates with a few of them
Kris and Chara both more shy than frisk, but smaller group of people they know, so they are comfy with them
be called they. Theres no signs of transphobia existing in the ut and dr universe/s, which would be the only reason (other than like social anxiety and that doesnt apply here) you wouldnt correct someone who misgendered you for the first time (at least from personal experience))
Not that I think the argument works anyway, these characters can speak to each other, if they didnt want to be called they, they would ask to be called something else (ive heard this argument used against they/them frisk and chara so much and in sick of it, they would correct if they didnt want to
And the argument of "x uses they bc thats the default" doesnt even work in this case since it seems to be the knight's preferred pronoun over they, and it is not a default pronoun for people (and similar). And flavour text is all knowing for everyone else's pronouns, so tracks that that applies here
Why is the assumption "character uses they or it bc mysterious until proven otherwise", rather than the much more obvious "character uses they or it bc they want to until proven otherwise"? Like why is Kris's use of they the exception not the rule
I specifically said in DR for a reason. Nowhere else that i can think of in DR (or for that matter UT but i could be wrong on that) has toby fox given a character pronouns for any reason other than thats what they use. DR is all about subverting trope expectations, why would this be any different
When, anywhere else in the game, are a character's pronouns assigned to build suspense and not just because that character uses those pronouns? It feels very minimising to write off The Knight's it/they as intentionally "nondescript [and] vague" rather than just the pronouns it uses
If 'The Knight' were not a separate persona from whoever it was before, we would know who it was before.
And yeah, it/they might not be all the pronouns the knight ever has, but its all we have right now, so until proven otherwise, he and she is still misgendering
With our current knowledge, the knight identity is seperate from the person it was before, so theorising 'x is the knight' is not a justifiable reason to use x's pronouns for the knight. And even if the two identities are not seperate, we dont know who x is, and therefore what extra pronouns to use
I was not saying the who was not important to its characterisation or plot or anything, just it isnt a factor in its pronouns. Whether x became the knight willingly or was coerced or just a victim to the prophecy, the knight persona doesnt use he or she with our current knowlegde
The flavour text in its battle exclusively uses it, so even if you don't think Queen is a trustworthy source, the flavour text is, and all that would bring up is whether they is the Knight's pronouns at all or just a guess by Queen and others