Marshall Steinbaum
@econmarshall.bsky.social
9.8K followers 690 following 1.9K posts
Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Utah. Senior Fellow in Higher Education Finance, Jain Family Institute. Aging enfant terrible.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
econmarshall.bsky.social
Chicago on Chicago crime

(H/t @pricelaborecon.bsky.social)
econmarshall.bsky.social
I have a new piece in @lpeblog.bsky.social

“Anti-monopolism as an Ideology of the Left”

responding to @gabrielwinant.bsky.social’s “provocation.”

lpeproject.org/blog/anti-mo...
econmarshall.bsky.social
We Are All Chicago. We Are All Salt Lake City.
Reposted by Marshall Steinbaum
mattseybold.bsky.social
Important piece from Marshall. Dismantling kleptocracy is the most urgent goal, & anti-monopoly policy must be part of that.

The problem we face, as I tackled last week, is that with very few exceptions, U.S. anti-monopoly policy has been antitrust, & has ranged from weak to counterproductive.
Reposted by Marshall Steinbaum
todddavi.es
Excellent essay!

It rebuts Marxist pessimism about the anti-monopoly movement, highlights the importance of contesting Capital's control of economic production, and ties it all into the recent failures of the movement (particularly wrt. the recent anti-monopolisation case against Google).
econmarshall.bsky.social
I have a new piece in @lpeblog.bsky.social

“Anti-monopolism as an Ideology of the Left”

responding to @gabrielwinant.bsky.social’s “provocation.”

lpeproject.org/blog/anti-mo...
econmarshall.bsky.social
In it I lay out a radical and moderate case for anti-monopolism. There’s a constituency for anti-capitalism here, or rather diverse constituencies of aggrieved consumers and producers that can be united by contesting capitalistic control & gatekeeping power.
/2
econmarshall.bsky.social
I have a new piece in @lpeblog.bsky.social

“Anti-monopolism as an Ideology of the Left”

responding to @gabrielwinant.bsky.social’s “provocation.”

lpeproject.org/blog/anti-mo...
Reposted by Marshall Steinbaum
economeager.bsky.social
this is not quite an anti-trust tragedy but it's certainly some kind of capital market regulation problem if people can buy assets that provide huge public goods specifically in order to destroy the public good provision
Reposted by Marshall Steinbaum
anotherjonah.bsky.social
This morning I was filming ICE abducting sometime in Petworth. One of the agents told me "the last US citizen that did this he put in cuffs all the way to the courtroom".
econmarshall.bsky.social
Oh and “Both” is referring to (2) not (1).
econmarshall.bsky.social
I believe you were in fact in the room when I asked this exact question at an ASSA session last year because you presented in that same session.
econmarshall.bsky.social
I don’t think changes in tax filing behavior are spurious statistical artifacts when the effective tax rate on (what the tax code considers to be) capital income has been on a steady 50 year decline!
econmarshall.bsky.social
Taking as given that some of the labor share of GDP has shifted to the self-employed/pass-through share,
1. Is that share “really” labor or capital income?
2. Among the self-employed/pass-through share, is it the low earners who are “really” capitalists or the high earners who are “really” workers?
econmarshall.bsky.social
1. What are the “faults” with these?

2. I had associated him with the “paradox” that innovation in the production process was low in the Roman Empire but economic growth was high, while the opposite was the case in the Middle Ages. Did I make that up? And how does he explain the paradox, if he has?
econmarshall.bsky.social
What else has he done? (Genuinely asking.)
econmarshall.bsky.social
Now you can be a victim of other people getting their student loans canceled.
econmarshall.bsky.social
That’s the whole point of posting something fake.
econmarshall.bsky.social
Foner of course, but also Railroaded by Richard White. I’ll think of more.
econmarshall.bsky.social
And the result of that is a further inference: that the main purpose of the WAR model is to vindicate your side in an ideological war by cosplaying as the sober numbers guys, rather than to actually understand the phenomenon you claim to be studying.
econmarshall.bsky.social
This is a good piece about the unstated assumptions underlying political data analytics, and specifically Wins Above Replacement. As so often in economics, once you make the counterfactual you’re measuring candidate performance against explicit, the inference you claim cannot possibly be supported.
bostonreview.bsky.social
To the Democratic pollster and data pundit, “moral claims and exercises of imagination, claims about what is possible come with glaring asterisks. New tactics and strategies are by definition unvalidated, and in that sense they are admittedly a risk. But there are risks the other way, too.”
How to Lie with (Political) Statistics - Boston Review
Inside the data wars over Democratic strategy.
www.bostonreview.net
econmarshall.bsky.social
Very sad to hear Malcolm Rutherford died. The world can be divided into people who do and do not understand the history of our discipline, on the basis of whether you have or have not read his book “The Institutionalist Movement in American Economics, 1918-1947.”
#econsky