Eben Muse
@ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
1.4K followers 1.7K following 1.2K posts
Access and nature campaigner, physicist, researcher who writes. Keen climber/runner. Views are my own! https://open.substack.com/pub/ebenmuse?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=jl6lw
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
The Guardian didn't end up using some of the most interesting photos for the article, but I'll share them here with credit to Rupert Allen.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Yes, Callaghan square is going to be TERRIBLE but it'll be for the greater good... 😅
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I'll believe that timeline when I see it! We are also supposed to be getting a tramline in Splot...
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Britain is the vanguard of this kind of crackdown.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
This is the third blocked off pedestrian way to the bay 😁 🤦‍♂️

Cool! I love being late
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Once again pointing out how insane it is that it takes the same amount of time to walk to walk to Cardiff Bay as it does to take public transport.

It's a joke!

And it's not like there's secure bike locking there.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Big Caerphilly Survation poll coming out on Thursday.

I'm predicting a significant Reform lead, unfortunately.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I'd invite Mark to have a chat to the real people who campaign for access reform and to ask their actual feelings towards nature, because they're often the same people fighting the hardest to protect it.

If helpful I can find a broader selection of birdwatchers to consult. 👍 🐦
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
So forgive me if this opinion piece "doesn't give the impression" of anything but a strange bitterness and a desire to keep nature for me, but not for thee.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I'd also raise the fact that currently our most important protected areas are also the areas are accessible under the CRoW act. This is a resolvable conflict, and the obvious way is to provide access elsewhere.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Nature is a priority, and restrictions are absolutely necessary.

But they should be supported by evidence and not some strange aversion to the 'wrong' sort of people in the countryside (perhaps people who haven't passed Mark's weird bird exam?).
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Here is (access org) BMC's network of restrictions, most of them due to sensitivities linked to nature sites, SSSIs and nesting birds.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
To anybody remotely involved in access, be that PRoWs, wild camping, outdoor recreation, cyclists, nature reserves, ramblers, right to roam, BMC, whatever it may be, the blithe suggestion that 'restrictions should be in the mix' stings, because restrictions were always a part of the conversation.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Another thing - to nostalgically reminisce about COVID-19 or foot-and-mouth as if they represent some sort of important lesson for society in terms of interacting with the environment seems myopic beyond belief. And I know for a fact that to people traumatised by these events it is offensive.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Disturbance isn't unimportant, nor should it ever be overlooked. But nor should it be oversimplified, nor idealised or viewed through a prism of misanthropy.

Far from nature being an afterthought, it is the raison d'être for the existence of the access movement.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
In our anthropogenic world, access and the protection of nature are necessarily intertwined. You'd have thought that someone so experienced in the conservation world would have been able to observe that at some point in a 25-year career with his wages paid by access to nature.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I'd like to know whether the ultimately inadequate provision that the RSPB delivered to that bird in the Cairngorms for so long have been possible without the public access that they've so effectively financialised for so long? I sincerely doubt it.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Other factors include predation, nitrogen deposition, habitat degradation, and yes, disturbance (this includes overgrazing by the way). So why focus on access, which seems to have become a pet hate?

How anti-access do you have to be that 9 new river walks go too far?

markavery.info/2025/07/30/a...
A daft quote from Defra – and an August challenge for anyone who fancies it. – Mark Avery
markavery.info
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Now, in this moment of weakening protections, threats of mass destruction of key habitats, erosion of BNG, and the mooted dissolution of landscape protections.

But sure, take aim at the people who are fighting for a country where nature is known and valued.

www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Plans to weaken protections for national parks will have ‘disastrous consequences’ say green groups
Exclusive: Letter from 170-plus organisations calls on government to drop proposed changes to planning law
www.theguardian.com
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Regardless of whether a green paper will appear in the spring (there are certainly rumours but nothing confirmed), it seems so inane to take aim at the access movement now.
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
Oh dear. What purpose does an opinion piece like this serve?

Heavily anecdotal (if he's met people who happen to agree with him, he must be right, surely!), it's the straw man of it that frustrates me.

LARGE THREAD/ 🧵
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I don't think they actually are sentimental either, they just see it as an easy bit of propaganda!
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
First they came for the XL Bullies and I said nothing
ebenmyrddin.bsky.social
I really dislike this kind of infantile comms. Jo Stevens is awful for it.