As long as they show their work (they do), then that’s irrelevant unless you identify the flaw in their analysis. And where’s your own study indicating otherwise?
It’s obvious you don’t know how to carry on a civil conversation. You also haven’t provided any worthwhile evidence to support your own view. Worth noting that the Waymo tech continually improves each year they collect more data, while aggregate human driving doesn’t really improve over time.
If she didn’t file a police report, we wouldn’t expect it to be included in law enforcement’s data. The question before us is not whether Waymo vehicles are perfect but whether they’re better than the average human. A cherry-picked lawsuit is meaningless.
I know nothing about Waymo’s puff pieces. I simply see their cars, without drivers, navigating the street I live on with ease on a daily basis. I cross the street feeling more confident they won’t run me over than a human driver.
The article you posted isn’t about Elon. It’s about the risk to humanity that the nightmare scenario of Kubrick’s film becomes reality. Another superb film on that topic is Ex Machina. If you don’t see the ver real danger these fictional films foretell, you’re not paying attention.
Jack Smith rigged the 2020 election? He was in the Netherlands at the time working for the International Criminal Court and investigating Kosovo war crimes. He was not named special prosecutor for Trump until 2022.
