Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 2d

𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴
↳ As long as your car is registered, you’re free to drive. A driving test is only required if others can provide overwhelming proof that you’re unsafe behind the wheel.

🤔 What do you think??

(4/4)

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 2d

𝗘𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝘀
↳ Instead of banning cars without brakes, authorities will simply require drivers to “reduce” the number of crashes over time.

(3/4)

1 1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 2d

𝗘𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻
↳ Drunk driving remains banned, except for “essential” trips — such as getting home from a bar.

𝗛𝗮𝘇𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘀𝗲𝗹𝗳-𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁
↳ Car manufacturers no longer need to crash-test vehicles. They simply declare them “safe by design.”

(2/4)

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 2d

🚘 What if the EU's chemicals legislation applied to traffic rules?

𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗼 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗰𝘁
↳ Stop signs are now “suggestions.” Drivers can roll through if they feel confident. The same applies to speed limits. Each driver decides what feels safe for them.

(1/4)

1 2

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 8d

🚩 Harmful PFAS substances have been found in the blood of 24 EU leaders representing 19 countries, confirming that no one is immune to exposure from these persistent “forever chemicals.”

Read the full press release here: chemsec.org/eu-leaders-c...

EU leaders contaminated with PFAS "forever chemicals"

PRESS RELEASE: Harmful PFAS substances have been found in the blood of 24 EU representing 19 countries.

chemsec.org

1 1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 13d

But here’s where it falls short:

⚠️ Member States have until 2039 (with possible extensions to 2045) to comply

⚠️ Only 25 PFAS total are now included on the list, not the 100+ recommended by scientists

⚠️ No strong framework to make polluters pay

⚠️ Chemical mixtures are still being largely ignored

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 13d

Here’s the good news:

✅ New hazardous substances were added to the list of water pollutants, including TFA, Bisphenol A, certain pesticides and some pharmaceuticals

✅ Mandatory testing will begin for the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs)

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 13d

🐟 After years of negotiations, the EU finally struck a deal last week to update their rules on water pollution. The deal is progress on paper, but something about it seems… fishy.

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 20d

🧠 Scientists have begun to argue that chemical pollution poses a similar threat to climate change.

👱‍♀️ Anne-Sofie Bäckar, head of ChemSec, agrees. Here she sets out the evidence.

➡️ Read the full article here: chemsec.org/chemicals-an...

2

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · 28d

💧 Next week, the EU will meet to discuss how to halt the rising chemical pollution in Europe's lakes and rivers.

🇪🇺 Yet members states are procrastinating, hoping to put off monitoring and cleanup efforts for decades.

👇🏽 Europe’s waters can’t wait — here are 4 priorities for the EU to tackle:

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Sep 15

🪓 The European Chemicals Agency recently announced that it will split the EU-wide #PFAS restriction, leaving out eight categories of PFAS uses.

👇🏻 Here are five reasons why this decision is a complete disaster.

1

Reposted by ChemSec

Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) @corporateeurope.org · Sep 10

The #SOTEU speech has started, shall we guess how many times we'll hear the word "competitiveness"?

We need #rulestoprotect people and the environment, not profit!

multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstream...

Debate on the State of the European Union 2025 (with nametags of the speakers) - Multimedia Centre

The multimedia platform of the European Parliament is the official public available repository of the media production of the Secretariat of the European Parliament, managed by the Directorate-General...

multimedia.europarl.europa.eu

2 14 29

Reposted by ChemSec

European Environmental Bureau🍃 @eeb.org · Sep 9

🔴 PFAS ('forever chemicals') found in wild fish across multiple EU countries!

New EEB report shows that:

🧪 Most samples exceed proposed safety limits
⚠️ Some exceed by 10,000x
🕰️ Member States want to delay action until 2051

Link in comments ⬇️

#PFAS #Environment #PublicHealth #ForeverChemicals

1 38 60

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Sep 8

📢 ECHA recently published an update to the EU-wide #PFAS restriction proposal, which included some pretty eye-catching changes.

🧡 In case you think 3,544 pages is a bit long and you don’t have time to read the whole thing — don’t worry. ChemSec has done it for you!

👉🏾 chemsec.org/pfas-restric...

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Sep 5

💬 “𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢 𝘭𝘰𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘺 𝘱𝘪𝘱𝘦𝘴 𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦” —unnamed ChemSec employee.

🏭 ChemSec on a field trip to the Perstorp chemical plant! For some of us, it was a first-time visit to a chemical production site. For the old-timers… not so much.

🙏 Regardless, it was a very interesting visit!

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Sep 1

🗣️ Now, countries want until 2039 to comply with newly proposed priority substances, with the possibility to derogate until 2051.

👉🏿 Read more: chemsec.org/forever-chem...

(2/2)

Forever chemicals, forever delays: Europe’s water crisis explained

The EU set a target to clean up our waters by 2015, which did not happen. A decade past the deadline, we have a water crisis on our hands.

chemsec.org

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Sep 1

📉 Europe’s flagship #water law set ambitious targets to clean up our waters by 2015. But now, a decade past the deadline, chemical pollution is rising. Today, less than 30% of Europe’s surface waters are in good chemical condition — and that number is getting worse, not better.

(1/2)

1 2 1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 27

🌍 This isn’t just any restriction we’re talking about. It deals with one of our time’s biggest environmental crises. The only way to come to grips with it is to “turn off the tap” with a universal approach that covers all uses.

🧐 Read more: chemsec.org/echa-just-sp...

(2/2)

ECHA just split the PFAS restriction. Here’s why it’s a disaster

ECHA just announced that it will split the EU-wide PFAS restriction, leaving out eight categories of PFAS uses. his is unacceptable.

chemsec.org

1 1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 27

🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The European Chemicals Agency just announced that it will split the EU-wide #PFAS restriction, leaving out eight categories of PFAS uses. This has never happened before — and it’s a dangerous precedent.

(1/2)

1 2 1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 26

👉🏾 Here is the ad: marketplace.chemsec.org/alternative/...

💡 This incident shows how far the chemicals industry goes to silence safer alternatives. But 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗼𝘅𝗶𝗰 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝘀 out there — and ChemSec Marketplace is where you find them.

(3/3)

The Marketplace | ChemSec Marketplace

marketplace.chemsec.org

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 26

☠️ The demand came from an industry group using ADCA, a Substance of Very High Concern (SVHC) known to cause very serious health effects.

🧐 The industry group challenged the fact that one of the Marketplace ads stated how nasty ADCA is and sent in their law firm to have us change the wording

(2/3)

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 26

👀 The international law firm Steptoe LLP demanded that ChemSec censor an ad for a safer chemical on ChemSec Marketplace, our popular tool connecting suppliers of safer chemicals with companies seeking alternatives.

(1/3)

1

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 25

🤠 A new study shows legacy #PFAS like PFOA and PFOS are finally declining in milk thanks to restrictions.

🫨 But “replacement” PFAS are spiking — some by more than 250%.

🥛 The lesson? Banning single substances won’t cut it. We must #BanPFAS as a family of chemicals to see real change.

Up-close cow in a play on the classic 'got milk' ads from the '90s, announcing a significant drop in legacy PFAS in milk over the last five years.

1 3

ChemSec @chemsec.bsky.social · Aug 18

😮 Is your feed flooded with gee-whizz, super-duper #PFAS clean-up technologies?

🧻 We all hope innovations can clean up the PFAS mess. Indeed, they are vital. But it doesn’t matter how much PFAS we take out if we keep on pumping them into the environment.