Alex Reeve (storyjoy)
banner
alexreeve.bsky.social
Alex Reeve (storyjoy)
@alexreeve.bsky.social
1.9K followers 1.5K following 150 posts
Award-losing author of the Leo Stanhope series of historical crime novels published by Bloomsbury. Rep’d by Carrie Plitt at Felicity Bryan Associates. Otherwise, an absent-minded Professor. Tries to be a good egg. Also enjoys a good egg. He/him.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
I couldn't find a Starter Pack for historical crime writers so I started one. If you'd like to be added, let me know! Please share so we can build up a great list. #historicalcrime #crimewriters go.bsky.app/2oZd48F
I haven't much to say and the world seems a bit grim, so … here's Bobbie. She doesn't care about that stuff as long as she gets to chill on the sofa.
These kinds of thing don't work for me, but everyone's process is different. Creative inspiration is very personal, I think.
Obvs not the point, but someone at The Spectator needs to read GRRM's books before abusing them. No such things occur.
Yes - I guess some novels have a kind of meta story that reveals itself - eg Owen Meaney and Use of Weapons. I’d be tempted to read those again.
These things can edge towards snobbery, ie some novels are ‘worthy’ of repeat reads and others not, and I don’t accept that idea at all.
It’s so personal, isn’t it? I wouldn’t read Agatha Christie twice, but I know people who do. Whereas I might read James Ellroy or Walter Mosley more than once. I think it’s more about the reader than the writer.
I hear folks with big Twitter/X followings say they're reluctant to come to Bluesky because they'll have to start again. I get that. The problem is, those followers on X are either RW arseholes or the left-over zombie accounts of people who've come to Bluesky. Are they really worth staying for?
a soldier with a skull on his face and the words `` zombie apocalypse '' above him .
ALT: a soldier with a skull on his face and the words `` zombie apocalypse '' above him .
media.tenor.com
Thank you to the @societyofauthors.bsky.social & @samblakebooks.bsky.social for leading on this. Could we propose a code of practice for publishers to ensure transparency for stakeholders & customers, eg ghosts & illustrators must be named on the front cover? Smaller font perhaps, but present.
Other industries are required to give credit where it's due, eg movies and academia. Why not publishing?
There are grey areas here between 'written by', 'story by' and so on. I've heard of some celebs who genuinely think they wrote something which has been heavily edited / borderline ghosted by the publisher.
Yes. My only caution is that celeb books are propping up publishers' revenues, & it isn't clear whether they're cannibalising proper books or are additive. Some of each, probably. As a first step, a specific recognition of who actually wrote the book - preferably on the cover - would be positive.
Yep, for sure. He's messing with the WRONG demographic.
He's not easily bullied at corners and is a decent stopper. Old school, but good as a back-up.
Ryan Mason will be searching out his ‘Interim Head Coach’ business cards right now.
I agree. I truly don’t want to cut off a revenue stream for publishers, but they should be clear when a work is written to a great extent by someone else. As you say, this should be addressed more strongly by SoA, CWA, etc.
Yes, agreed. I daresay ghost writers like the income, and fair enough. I’m not against ghost writing per se at all. I just think the publisher should be more clear - find a form of words by which an interested reader can see who did what. It doesn’t seem a lot to ask.
Agreed, most likely, and sadly.
True, of course, and the books may actually be great. But can’t they be honest anyway?